Comparative Study Between Pedicled Groin Flap and Free Anterolateral Thigh Flap in Reconstruction of Complex Soft Tissue Hand Defects

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 The Department of Plastic Surgery , Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University

2 The Department of General Surgery, Plastic Surgery Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University

Abstract

Background: Soft tissue defects of the hand present a significant
challenge in reconstructive surgery due to the hand’s
intricate anatomy and essential functional role. One of the
main considerations in hand reconstruction is the choice of
an appropriate flap. Among the various flaps used in hand reconstruction,
the pedicled groin flap and the free anterolateral
thigh flap have gained significant attention.
Objective: This study aimed to compare between pedicled
groin flap and free anterolateral thigh flap in complex hand
defects reconstructions regarding patient demographics, flap < br />outcomes, complication rates, donor site morbidities and hospitalization
period.
Material and Methods: This multicenter prospective clinical
trial was conducted from March 2021 to March 2022 on 20
patients with a clinical diagnosis of soft tissue defects of hand
recruited from the Plastic Surgery Unit at General Surgery department,
Faculty of Medicine, Benha University Hospital and
Plastic Surgery department, Faculty of Medicine and Al Azhar
University. Patients were divided into two groups, group (A)
10 patients who underwent pedicled groin flap and group (b):
10 patients who underwent free anterolateral thigh flap.
Results: There were 14 males and 6 female their age
ranged from 18-62 year. 7 cases resulting from crush injury, 5
cases were due to burn and 8 cases were due to friction burn.
Out of 10 patients who were reconstructed by pedicled groin
flap, 1 patient (10%) was complicated by partial wound dehiscence
and only 1 patient (10%) was complicated by infection.
out of 10 patients were reconstructed by The free anterolateral
thigh flap 1 (10%) patient complicated by flap failure, 1 (10%)
patient complicated by partial wound dehiscence and only 1
(10%) patient complicated by infection.
Conclusion: The pedicled groin flap demonstrated favorable
outcomes in older patients, leading to shorter operation
times and hospital stays, making it a practical option for cases
with relatively smaller defects. Conversely, the free anterolateral
thigh flap proved suitable for complex large hand defects
involving exposed tendons and joints, and it tended to be utilized
more often in younger patients. Patient satisfaction and
complication rates were compared between the two groups.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Adani R.: Dorsal hand coverage. BMC Proc., 9 (Suppl 3):
A59. doi:10.1186/1753-6561-9-S3 A59, 2015.
2- Khan M.M., Yaseen M., Bariar L.M. and Khan S.M.: Clinical
study of dorsal ulnar artery flap in hand reconstruction.
Indian J. Plast. Surg., 42 (1): 52-57. doi:10.4103/0970-
0358.53012, 2009.
3- Romana Parvin1*, Mohd Fazle Rubby2, Mohammad Abul
Kalam Azad3, Md. Toriqul Islam4 and Md Shahidul Islam
Farhad5: “Groin Flap” for Reconstruction of Defects on
Dorsum of the Hand. Annals of International Medical and
Dental Research E-ISSN: 2395-2822 | P-ISSN: 2395-2814
2021.
4- Bocchi A., Quarta L., Castri A.D., Boschi E. and Caleffi
E.: Reverse perforator flaps in the reconstruction of the
hand. our clinical experience. The Open Orthopaedics
Journal, 9 (1): 1, 2015.
5- Takahashi M., Kasai T., Nishisho T., Takai M., Endo H.,
Hirose T., et al.: Reverse adipofascial flap after resection
of a malignant perineurioma of the forearm. Orthopedics,
37 (7): e661-4. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20140626-65,
2014.
6- Liu X., Huo D. and Wu G.: Deep Inferior Epigastric Flap
Combined Bilateral-Anterolateral Thigh Flap for the Coverage
of Both Lower Extremity Soft-Tissue Defect: A
Case Report and a Literature Review. Clin. Cosmet Investig
Dermatol., 14: 153-161, 2021.
7- Sagheer S.H. and Reschly W.: A case report of aberrant
vascular anatomy of the anterolateral thigh flap. Cureus,
11, 2019.
8- Cormack G.: Anterolateral thigh flap: Technical tip to facilitate
elevation. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 45:
74, 1992.
9- Benanti E., De Santis G., Leti Acciaro A., Colzani G., Baccarani
A. and Starnoni M.: Soft tissue coverage of the upper
limb: A flap reconstruction overview. Ann. Med. Surg.
(Lond), 60: 338-343, 2020.
10- Moustafa Meky: Versatility of Anterolateral Thigh Flap
in Dorsal Hand Reconstruction Egypt, J. Plast. Reconstr.
Surg., Vol. 42, No. 2, July: 311-315, 2018.
11- Hussain T., Khan F.H., Rahman O.U. and Beg M.S.A.: Superficial
Circumflex Iliac Artery Free Flap for Coverage of
Hand Injuries. Cureus, 14: e31520, 2022.
12- Kayano S., Sakuraba M., Miyamoto S., Nagamatsu S.,
Taji M., Umezawa H., et al.: Comparison of pedicled and
free anterolateral thigh flaps for reconstruction of complex
defects of the abdominal wall: review of 20 consecutive
cases. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet Surg, 65: 1525-9, 2012.
13- Du S., Wei S., Zhang H., Li P., Ni X., Hua F., et al.: Comparison
of “complications” and functional outcome of anterolateral
thigh flap and sural neurofasciocutaneus flap
for foot and ankle reconstruction: A single center cohort
study. Injury, 53: 3843-3848, 2022.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics