A Trial to Improve the Outcome of Patients with Cleft Palate Repair by Using Human Fibrin Glue: A Study in 20 Cases

Document Type : Research article

Authors

1 The Department of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University

2 The Department of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University

Abstract

Introduction: Cleft palates are among the commonest
craniofacial abnormalities. Cleft palate repair is not free of
complications. The formation of a fistula is the most common
complication of palatoplasty.
Aim of Work: To rectify the benefit of using human fibrin
glue as a catalyst in primary palatoplasty and its effect on
lowering the development of postoperative complications.
Methods: Primary palatoplasty was performed for twenty
patients by double flap palatoplasty with human fibrin glue
as a catalyst in the reform from January 2019 to June 2019.
Fibrin glue was prepared from fresh frozen plasma to obtain
thrombin and cryoprecipitate to obtain fibrinogen. Then was
injected between the two palatal flaps and at the suture line
as well.
Results: Out of twenty patients, 5 cases (25%) showed
post-operative complications. Two cases (10%) were complicated
by oronasal palatal fistula one of them (5%) were small
(2mm) at the intersection of soft and hard palate without any
nasal regurgitation and closed spontaneously within two
months of post-operative follow-up. The other one (5%)
continued for further surgical repair, and it also had early
wound infection. Two cases (10%) were complicated by upper
airway obstruction, and one patient (5%) was complicated by
hemorrhage.
Conclusions: The rate of occurrence of complications
was less than in other studies that did the same procedure
without the utilization of fibrin glue in the repair. More
research with more patients and a more extended period of
follow-up is recommended.

Keywords

Main Subjects


1- McMahon, Jr. E.M.: “Atlas of Pediatric Physical Diagnosis,
4th ed,” Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine,
Vol. 157, No. 6, pp. 605-605, Jun. 2003, doi: 10.1001/
ARCHPEDI.157.6.605.
2- Singh V., Singh A. and V. K.-J. of C.L.P. and, undefined
2015, “Use of fibrin sealant in prevention of hanging
palate: A rare complication after cleft palate surgery,”
jclpca.org, Accessed: Apr. 12, 2022. [Online]. Available:
https://jclpca.org/article.asp?issn=2348-2125;year=
2015;volume=2;issue=1;spage=74;epage=76;aulast=Si
ngh.
3- Becker M. and Hansson E.: “Low rate of fistula formation
after Sommerlad palatoplasty with or without lateral
incisions: An analysis of risk factors for formation of
fistulas after palatoplasty,” Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive
& Aesthetic Surgery, Vol. 66, No. 5, pp. 697-703,
May 2013, doi: 10.1016/J.BJPS.2013.01.031.
4- Shimizu M., Shigetaka Y., Mizuki H. and Okamoto A.:
“Oronasal fistulae in repaired cleft palates,” Journal of
Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol. 17, No. Suppl. 1, pp.
37-38, Dec. 1989, doi: 10.1016/S1010-5182(89)80039-3.
5- Rossell-Perry P., E.C. N.-J. F.P. and undefined 2014,
“Association between palatal index and cleft palate repair
outcomes in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip
and palate”, liebertpub.com, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 206-210,
2014, doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2013.2537.
6- Aronson J.K. and Ferner R.E.: “Joining the DoTS: New
approach to classifying adverse drug reactions,” BMJ,
Vol. 327, No. 7425, pp. 1222-1225, Nov. 2003, doi:
10.1136/BMJ.327.7425.1222.
7- Zhang Z., et al.: “Analysis of complications in primary
cleft lips and palates surgery,” Journal of Craniofacial
Surgery, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 968-971, 2014, doi: 10.1097/
SCS.0000000000000832.
8- Rossell-Perry P., Nano E.C. and Gavino-Gutierrez A.M.:
“Association Between Palatal Index and Cleft Palate
Repair Outcomes in Patients With Complete Unilateral
Cleft Lip and Palate,” https://home.liebertpub.
com/jamafacial, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 206-210, May 2014,
doi: 10.1001/JAMAFACIAL.2013.2537.
9- Tache A. and Mommaerts M.Y.: “On the Frequency of
Oronasal Fistulation After Primary Cleft Palate Repair,”
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, Vol. 56, No. 10, pp.
1302-1313, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1177/1055665619856243.
10- Singh V., Singh A.K. and Kumar V.: “Use of fibrin sealant
in prevention of hanging palate: A rare complication after
cleft palate surgery,” Journal of Cleft Lip Palate and
Craniofacial Anomalies, Vol. 2, No. 1, p. 74, 2015, doi:
10.4103/2348-2125.150762.
11- Cohen S.R., Kalinowski J., LaRossa D. and Randall P.:
“Cleft palate fistulas: A multivariate statistical analysis
of prevalence, etiology, and surgical management.,” Plastic
and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 87, No. 6, pp. 1041-
1047, Jun. 1991, doi: 10.1097/00006534-199106000-
00005.
12- Morris H.L., Bardach J., VanDemark D.R., Jones D.L. and
Sharkey S.G.: “Results of two-flap palatoplasty with
regard to speech production,” European Journal of Plastic
Surgery, 1989 12: 2, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 19-24, Mar. 1989,
doi: 10.1007/BF02892640.
13- Mahboubi H., Truong A. and Pham N.S.: “Prevalence,
demographics, and complications of cleft palate surgery,”
International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology,
Vol. 79, No. 6, pp. 803-807, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1016/
J.IJPORL.2015.02.032.
14- Parwaz M.A., Sharma R.K., Parashar A., Nanda V., Biswas
G. and Makkar S.: “Width of cleft palate and post-operative
palatal fistula - do they correlate?,” Journal of Plastic,
Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, Vol. 62, No. 12, pp.
1559-1563, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.1016/J.BJPS.2008.05.048.
15- Basha S., Srinath N., Kumar N. and Balaji R.: “Role of
Fibrin Glue in palatoplasty to prevent formation of oronasal
fistula - An in vivo study,” Asian Journal of Oral
and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 177-180,
Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1016/J.AJOMS.2011.05.002.
16- Nguyen C., Hernandez-Boussard T., Davies S.M., Bhattacharya
J., Khosla R.K. and Curtin C.M.: “Cleft palate
surgery: An evaluation of length of stay, complications,
and costs by hospital type”, Cleft Palate-Craniofacial
Journal, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 412-419, Jul. 2014, doi:
10.1597/12-150.
17- Williams W.N., et al.: “Prospective clinical trial comparing
outcome measures between furlow and von langenbeck
palatoplasties for UCLP,” Annals of Plastic Surgery, Vol.
66, No. 2, pp. 154-163, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1097/
SAP.0B013E3181D60763.
18- Pradel W., Senf D., Mai R., Ludicke G., U. E.-J. P. and
undefined 2009, “One-stage palate repair improves speech
outcome and early maxillary growth in patients with cleft
lip and palate,” scholar.archive.org, Accessed: Apr. 12,
2022. [Online]. Available: https://scholar.archive.
org/work/75mokatp4nax3jbqkvodrzovsy/access/waybac
k/http://www.jpp.krakow.pl/journal/archive/12_09_s8/p
df/37_12_09_s8_article.pdf.
19- Al-Nawas B., Wriedt S., Reinhard J., Keilmann A., Wehrbein
H. and Wagner W.: “Influence of patient age and
experience of the surgeon on early complications after
surgical closure of the cleft palate - A retrospective cohort
study,” Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol. 41,
No. 2, pp. 135-139, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1016/
J.JCMS.2012.06.005.
20- Mommaerts M.Y., Combes F.A.A.M. and Drake D.: “The
Furlow Z-plasty in two-staged palatal repair modifications
and complications,” British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial
Surgery, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 94-99, Apr. 2006, doi:
10.1016/J.BJOMS.2005.03.019.
21- Rohrich R.J., et al.: “Timing of hard palatal closure: A
critical long-term analysis”, Plastic and Reconstructive
Surgery, Vol. 98, No. 2, pp. 236-246, Aug. 1996, doi:
10.1097/00006534-199608000-00005.
22- Deshpande G.S., et al.: “Early complications after cleft
palate repair: A multivariate statistical analysis of patients,”
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 1614-
1618, 2014, doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001113