Elwakeel, H. (2021). Distally Based Medial Hemisoleus Muscle Flap for Reconstruction of Distal and Middle Third Leg Defects. The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 45(4), 211-218. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2021.201630
Helmy Elwakeel. "Distally Based Medial Hemisoleus Muscle Flap for Reconstruction of Distal and Middle Third Leg Defects". The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 45, 4, 2021, 211-218. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2021.201630
Elwakeel, H. (2021). 'Distally Based Medial Hemisoleus Muscle Flap for Reconstruction of Distal and Middle Third Leg Defects', The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 45(4), pp. 211-218. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2021.201630
Elwakeel, H. Distally Based Medial Hemisoleus Muscle Flap for Reconstruction of Distal and Middle Third Leg Defects. The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2021; 45(4): 211-218. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2021.201630
Distally Based Medial Hemisoleus Muscle Flap for Reconstruction of Distal and Middle Third Leg Defects
The Department of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Egypt
Abstract
Background: Coverage of distal leg defects is quite challenging. Usually, free tissue transfer is used for the reconstruction of such defects. Lack of microsurgical team/setup < br />or patient contraindication to undergo a lengthy procedure would divert the decision to local tissues for coverage typically using local fasciocutaneous/propeller flaps or muscle flaps. Also, those local flaps options would be the first choice for relatively small defects, with plenty of healthy tissue available for coverage. If a local fasciocutaneous flap is not feasible or desired, the distally based medial hemisoleus flap is a common reliable alternative for reconstruction of middle and/or distal third leg defects of small to moderate size. In the current series, relatively larger defects were successfully reconstructed using this flap. Intraoperative confirmation of the adequacy of the explored flap distal pedicle underly the reported satisfactory flap survival rate. Patients and Methods: The study enrolled 13 cases (12 male & 1 female) with distal and/or middle third leg defects. Patients' age ranged from 12-51 years age (mean 37 years), with defect sizes ranging from 3.5x5cm (17.5cm2) to 8x10cm (80cm2) with a mean of 41cm2. Distally based medial hemisoleus flap was used to reconstruct all cases, based on its distal pedicle(s) from the posterior tibial vessels. A split thickness skin graft was used to cover the muscle typically one week later in a second procedure. Results: All flaps survived completely except partialthickness surficial flap necrosis in one case. This was conservatively managed by debridement and later skin grafting. All cases achieved complete healing of their wounds with successful limb salvage. Conclusions: Intraoperative confirmation of distal medial hemisoleus flap pedicle would ensure better flap survival and would allow safe reconstruction of moderately large distal leg defects in selected cases with appropriate distal pedicle size and location.
1- Marek C.A. and Pu L.L..: Refinements of free tissue transfer for optimal outcome in lower extremity reconstruction. Ann. Plast. Surg., 52: 270-275, 2004. 2- Swartz W.M. and Mears D.C.: The role of free-tissue transfer in lower extremity reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 76: 364-373, 1985. 3- Heller L. and Levin L.S.: Lower extremity microvascular reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 108: 1029-1041, 2002. 4- Nazerali R.S. and Pu L.L.: Free tissue transfer to the lower extremity: A paradigm shift in flap selection for soft tissue reconstruction. Ann. Plast. Surg., 70: 419-422, 2013. 5- Pu L.L.: Soft-tissue reconstruction of an open tibial wound in the distal third of the leg: A new treatment algorithm. Ann. Plast. Surg., 58 (1): 78-83, 2007. 6- Thornton B.P., Rosenblum W.J. and Lee L.: Reconstruction of limited soft-tissue defect with open tibial fracture in the distal third of the leg. Ann. Plast. Surg., 54 (3): 276- 80, 2005. 7- Calderon W., Chang N. and Mathes S.J.: Comparison of the effect of bacterial inoculation in musculocutaneous and fasciocutaneous flaps. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 77 (5): 785-94, 1986. 8- Chang N. and Mathes S.J.: Comparison of the effect of bacterial inoculation in musculocutaneous and randompattern flaps. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 70 (1): 1-10, 1982. 218 Vol. 45, No. 4 / Distally Based Medial Hemisoleus Muscle Flap 9- Gosain A., Chang N., Mathes S., et al.: A study of the relationship between blood flow and bacterial inoculation in musculocutaneous and fasciocutaneous flaps. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 86 (6): 1152-63, 1990. 10- Salgado C.J., Mardini S., Jamali A.A., et al.: Muscle versus nonmuscle flaps in the reconstruction of chronic osteomyelitis defects. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 118 (6): 1401-11, 2006. 11- Yazar S., Lin C.H., Lin Y.T., et al.: Outcome comparison between free muscle and free fasciocutaneous flaps for reconstruction of distal third and ankle traumatic open tibial fractures. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 117 (7): 2468-75, 2006. 12- Cho E.H., Shammas R.L., Carney M.J., et al.: Muscle versus fasciocutaneous free flaps in lower extremity traumatic reconstruction: A multicenter outcomes analysis. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 141 (1): 191-9, 2018. 13- Tobin G.R.: Hemisoleus and reversed hemisoleus flaps. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 76: 87-96, 1985. 14- Hassan K.M., Mohamed A.M. and Mohamed M.S.: Clinical Evaluation of Peroneous Brevis Muscle Flap as a Reconstructive Tool for Defects Around the Ankle. Egypt, J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 43 (3): 557-564, 2019. 15- Pu L.L.: The reversed medial hemisoleus muscle flap and its role in reconstruction of an open tibial wound in the lower third of the leg. Ann. Plast. Surg., 56: 59-64, 2006. 16- Schierle C.F., Rawlani V., Galiano R.D., et al.: Improving outcomes of the distally based hemisoleus flap: Principles of angiosomes in flap design. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 123: 1748-1754, 2009. 17- Houdek M.T., Wagner E.R., Wyles C.C., et al.: Reverse medial hemisoleus flaps for coverage of distal third leg wounds: A technical trick. J. Orthop. Trauma, 30 (4): 138- 42, 2016. 18- Unluer Z., Al-Ajam Y. and Al-Benna S.: Functional outcome after reconstruction of traumatic soft tissue defects in the lower half of the leg with distally based medial hemisoleus muscle flaps. A case series and literature review. Ann. Plast. Surg., 81: 468-471, 2018. 19- Rabbani M.J., Ata-ul-Haq, Riaz A., et al.: Distally based medial hemisoleus flap: reliable option for distal tibial wounds. J. Coll Physicians Surg. Pak., 28 (2): 129-32, 2018. 20- Mathes S.J. and Nahai F.: Classification of the vascular anatomy of muscle: Experimental and clinical correlation. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 67: 177-87, 1981. 21- Hallock G.G.: Getting the most from the soleus muscle. Ann. Plast. Surg., 36: 139-146, 1996. 22- Raveendran S.S. and Kumaragama K.G.: Arterial supply of the soleus muscle: Anatomical study of fifty lower limbs. Clin. Anat., 16: 248-252, 2003. 23- Park I.J., Sur Y.J. and You S.L.: Reconstruction of the soft tissue defect on anteromedial surface of the leg using medial hemisoleus flap. J. Korean Soc. Microsurg., 23:76- 81, 2014. 24- Pu L.L.: Further experience with the medial hemisoleus muscle flap for soft-tissue coverage of a tibial wound in the distal third of the leg. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 121: 2024-2028, 2008
View on SCiNiTO
Top