(2023). Post-Operative Evaluation of Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Virtual Planning in Reconstructive Craniofacial Surgeries. The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 47(1), 41-50. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2023.284344
. "Post-Operative Evaluation of Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Virtual Planning in Reconstructive Craniofacial Surgeries". The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 47, 1, 2023, 41-50. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2023.284344
(2023). 'Post-Operative Evaluation of Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Virtual Planning in Reconstructive Craniofacial Surgeries', The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 47(1), pp. 41-50. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2023.284344
Post-Operative Evaluation of Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Virtual Planning in Reconstructive Craniofacial Surgeries. The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2023; 47(1): 41-50. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2023.284344
Post-Operative Evaluation of Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Virtual Planning in Reconstructive Craniofacial Surgeries
Background: The accurate knowledge of the three–dimensional properties of the missing bone is necessary for the reconstruction of bony craniofacial deformities as a result of cancer procedures. Aim: The objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of post-operative three-dimensional computerized tomography by overlapping it with previous planned one. Patients and Methods: The study was conducted on 20 patients presented to The Plastic Surgery Department at Sohag University Hospital, and at Maxillofacial Department Nasser Institute and private clinic (IDC) between May 2021 and May 2022. Virtual planning programs were used for preoperative assessment and planning as: Memics Medical 21, 3-matic medical 13 and proplan program. Result: Regarding our finding, we included two categories, 1st category was craniofacial implant (12) 60% and 2nd category was 8 (40%) orthognathic surgeries. In implant category, 9 cases had accuracy ranged from 97 to 98.8% and 3 cases had accuracy ranged from 83.5-86%. In orthognathic category, 8 cases had accuracy ranged from 97.8 to 99% and 2 cases had accuracy ranged from 75.6 to 76.9%. Conclusion: This prospective cohort study shows that virtual surgical planning significantly yielded satisfactory outcomes, alongside negligible three-dimensional deviation postoperatively in patients who needed craniofacial surgeries. This indicates CAD/CAM allows for faster surgery, greater aesthetics, and may be accomplished for the same price as traditional techniques.
Cho R.S., Lopez J., Musavi L., Kachniarz B., Macmillan A., Badiei B., Bello R. and Dorafshar A.H.: "Computer- Assisted Design and Manufacturing Assists Less Experienced Surgeons in Achieving Equivalent Outcomes in Cranial Vault Reconstruction". J. Craniofac. Surg., 30 (7): 2034-2038, 2019. 2- Gray R., Gougoutas A., Nguyen V., Taylor J. and Bastidas N.: "Use of three-dimensional, CAD/CAM-assisted, virtual surgical simulation and planning in the pediatric craniofacial population". Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol., 97: 163-169, 2017. 3- Wang P., Zhang Z., Wang Y., Li X., Ye B. and Li J.: "The accuracy of virtual-surgical-planning-assisted treatment of hemifacial microsomia in adult patients: Distraction osteogenesis vs. orthognathic surgery." Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 48 (3): 341, 2019. 4- Hassfeld S. and Mühling J.: "Computer assisted oral and maxillofacial surgery a review and an assessment of technology". Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 30 (1): 2-13, 2001. 5- Vannier M.W., Marsh J. L. and Warren J.O.: Three dimensional CT reconstruction images for craniofacial surgical planning and evaluation. Radiology, 150: 179-84, 1984. 6- Moellmann H.L., Mehr V.N., Karnatz N., Wilkat M., Riedel E. and Rana M.: Evaluation of the Fitting Accuracy of CAD/CAM-Manufactured Patient-Specific Implants for the Reconstruction of Cranial Defects-A Retrospective Study. J. Clin. Med., 11: 25-36, 2022. 7- Zarringhalam H., Hopkinson N., Kamperman N.F., et al.: Effects of processing on microstructure and properties of SLS Nylon 12. Mater Sci. Eng. A, 435-436: 172-180, 2006 8- Kobayashi K., Yukiue T., Yoshida H., Tsuboi N., Takahashi Y., Makino K., et al.: Ultra-high-molecular-weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) Wing Method for Strong Cranioplasty. Neurol. Med. Chir. (Tokyo), 61: 549-556, 2021. 9- Saigal S. and Khan M.M.: Primary Assessment and Care in Maxillofacial Trauma. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery for the Clinician. Springer. 983-995, 2021. 10- Markiewicz M.R., Bell R.B. and Weedman S.: Maxillofacial Trauma. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 107-68, 2022. 11- Witek L., Nayak V.V., Runyan C.M., Tovar N., Elhage S., Melville J.C., et al.: Tissue Engineering Strategies for Craniomaxillofacial Surgery: Current Trends in 3D-Printed Bioactive Ceramic Scaffolds. Innovative Bioceramics in Translational Medicine II, 55-74, 2022. 12- Thakker J.S., Pace M., Lowe I., Jung P. and Herford A.S.: Virtual surgical planning in maxillofacial trauma. Atlas of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America, 27: 143-55, 2019. 13- Christensen A.M., Weimer K., Beaudreau C., Rensberger M. and Johnson B.: The Digital Thread for Personalized Craniomaxillofacial Surgery. Digital Technologies in Craniomaxillofacial Surgery. Springer, 23-45, 2018. 14- Coronel M.M., Farag I. and Shallik N.A.: Computer- Assisted 3D Reconstruction in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Virtual Endoscopy and 3D Reconstruction in the Airways. Springer, 20: 67-8, 2019. 15- Caloss R., Atkins K. and Stella J.P.: Three-dimensional imaging for virtual assessment and treatment simulation in orthognathic surgery. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. North Am., 19: 287-309, 2007. 16- Arafat S.W., Ibrahim W.H., Shaker S., AlDainy D.G., Salama, D. and Shaheen, H.A.: Reconstruction of Cranial Bone Defects Using Polyamide 12 Patient-Specific Implant: Long Term Follow-Up. J. Craniofac. Surg., 33: 1825-1828, 2022. 17- Maglitto F., Dell'Aversana Orabona G., Committeri U., Salzano G., De Fazio G.R., Vaira L.A., et al.: Virtual Surgical Planning and the “In-House” Rapid Prototyping Technique in Maxillofacial Surgery: The Current Situation and Future Perspectives. Appl, 11, 2021. 18- Khashaba M.M., Shaheen H.A., Ibrahim W.H. and AlDainy, D.G.: Accuracy of patient-specific temporal implants using PEKK. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg., 49: 943-949, 2021. 19- Xu Y., Yan X., Hua C., Wang S., Wu J. and Tan Q.: Reconstruction of Craniomaxillofacial Bone Defects With Customized Prosthesis of Hydroxyapatite/Epoxide Acrylate Maleic Compound Designed by Computer-Aided Technique. J. Craniofac. Surg., 31: 389-392, 2020. 20- Wurm M.C., Hagen J., Nkenke E., Neukam F.W. and Schlittenbauer T.: The fitting accuracy of pre-bend reconstruction plates and their impact on the temporomandibular joint. J. Craniomaxillofac Surg. J. Cranio Maxill Surg., 47: 53-9, 2019. 21- Tarsitano A., Ciocca L., Scotti R. and Marchetti C.: Morphological results of customized microvascular mandibular reconstruction: A comparative study. J. Crani50 Vol. 47, No. 1 / Accuracy of 3-Dimensional Virtual Planning in Craniofacial Surgeries omaxillofac. Surg. J. Cranio. Maxill Surg., 44: 697-702, 2016. 22- Gulati M., Anand V., Salaria S.K., Jain N. and Gupta S.: Computerized implant-dentistry: Advances toward automation. J. Indian Soc. Periodontol., 19: 5-10, 2015. 23- Graham D.O., Lim C.G., Coghlan P. and Erasmus J.: A Literature Review of Rapid Prototyping and Patient Specific Implants for the Treatment of Orbital Fractures. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction, 19433875211004314, 2021. 24- Levine J.P., Patel A., Saadeh P.B. and Hirsch D.L.: Computer- aided design and manufacturing in craniomaxillofacial surgery: The new state of the art. J. Craniofac. Surg., 23: 288-93, 2012. 25- Shaheen E., Coopman R., Jacobs R. and Politis C.: Optimized 3D virtually planned intermediate splints for bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: A clinical validation study in 20 patients. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg., 46: 1441-1447, 2018. 26- Tran N.H., Tantidhnazet S., Raocharernporn S., Kiattavornchareon S., Pairuchvej V. and Wongsirichat N.: Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Planning in Surgery-First Orthognathic Surgery: Planning Versus Outcome. J. Clin. Med. Res., 10: 429-436, 2018.