A Novel Technique for Correction of Bottoming Out Following Inferior Pedicle Breast Reduction

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

The Department of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University

Abstract

Introduction: Bottoming out is a frequent pitfall of breast
reduction following inferior pedicle technique. This is attributed
to the lack of deep tissue suspension and skin envelope
relaxation. The condition is associated with lack of medial
fullness and poor projection. The authors present a new
technique that depends on redistribution and auto-augmentation
rather than resection of tissues.
Patients and Methods: The technique was performed in
25 patients who had bottoming out following inferior pedicle
breast reduction. The time elapsed from the primary surgery
to the corrective surgery ranged from 2 to 4.5 years with a
mean of 2.5 years. The used technique consists of deepithelialization
and complete division of the lower segment at the
infra-mammary fold. The divided lower dermoglandular
segment is rolled in a retromammary pocket underneath the
pedicle and fixed to the pectoral fascia. The idea is to use this
lower segment of the inferior pedicle as an auto-prosthesis.
Follow-up period is 12 months.
Results: All patients achieved good breast shape with
good projection. There were no serious complications. Only
two patients developed partial wound disruption.
Conclusion: A novel technique for correction of bottoming
out following inferior pedicle breast reduction was used with
good surgical outcome

Keywords

Main Subjects


1- Ribeiro L., Accorsi A. Jr., Buss A. and Marcal-Pessoa M.:
Creation and evolution of 30 years of the inferior pedicle
in reduction mammaplasties. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 110:
960-970, 2002.
2- Brink R: Management of true ptosis of the breast. Plast.
Reconstr. Surg., 91: 657, 1993.
3- Chalekson C.P., Neumeister M.W., Zook E.G. and Russell
R.C.: Outcome Analysis of Reduction Mammaplasty
Using the Modified Robertson Technique, Plast. Reconstr.
Surg., 110: 1, July 2002.
4- Small K.H., Tepper O.M., Unger J.G., Kumar N., Feldman
D.L., Choi M. and Karp N.S.: Re-defining pseudoptosis
from a 3D perspective after short scar-medial pedicle
reduction mammaplasty, Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive
& Aesthetic Surgery, 63: 346e353, 2010.
5- Graf R. and Biggs T.M.: In Search of Better Shape in
Mastopexy and Reduction Mammoplasty Discussion by
Foad Nahai, Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 110: 1, July 2002.
6- Rohrich R.J., Gosman A.A., Brown S.A. and Reisch J.:
Mastopexy Preferences: A Survey of Board-Certified Plastic
Surgeons, Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 118: 7, Dec. 2006.
7- Davison S.P., Mesbahi A.N., Ducic I., Sarcia M., Dayan
J. and Spear S.L.: The Versatility of the Superomedial
Pedicle with Various Skin Reduction Patterns. Plast.
Reconstr. Surg., 120: 6, Nov., 2007.
8- Ramirez O.M.: Reduction Mammaplasty with the “Owl”
Incision and No Undermining, Plast. Reconstr. Surg.,
109: 2, Feb. 2002.
9- Chun Y.S., Lalonde D.H. and May J.W. Jr.: Internal Pedicle
Shaping to Improve Aesthetic Results in Reduction Mammaplasty.
Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 119: 4, April 1, 2007.
10- Ceydeli A., Louis J., Yu J. and Ritter E.: Lateral Septal
Preservation: A Technique to Improve Projection in Inferior
Pedicle Reduction Mammaplasty by Preventing Lateral
Displacement of the Pedicle. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 120:
4, 1088-9, Sept 15, 2007.
11- Katsaros J., Harvey I. and Caplash Y.: The triplicated
inferior pedicle: A new method for breast reduction and
mastopexy Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic
Surgery, Volume 63, Issue 7, Pages 1131-1135, July 2010.
12- Brown R.H., Izaddoost S. and Bullocks J.M.: Preventing
the ''Bottoming Out'' and ''Star-gazing'' Phenomena in
Inferior Pedicle Breast Reduction with an Acellular Dermal
Matrix Internal Brassiere, Aesth. Plast. Surg., July 2010.
13- Millard D.R. Jr., Walter R.M. and Lesavoy M.A.: Secondary
Correction of the Too-High Areola and Nipple After
A Mammaplasty. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 58: 5, Nov, 1976.
14- Raffel B.: Technique For Correction of Areola Misplacement
With No New Scars. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 88: 5,
Nov., 1991.
15- Colwell A.S., May J.W. Jr. and Slavin S.A.: Lowering the
Postoperative High-Riding Nipple Volume 120, Number
3, Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Sept., 1, 2007.
16- Hudson D.A. and Skoll P.J.: Repeat Reduction Mammaplasty.
Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 104: 2, pp. 401-8, Aug., 1999.
78 Vol. 43, No. 1 / A Novel Technique for Correction of Bottoming Out
17- Mathes S.J.: Plastic Surgery, 2nd ed., 6 (135), 2006.
18- Keck M., Kaye K., Thieme I., et al.: Vertical mammaplasty:
postoperative changes, complications, and patient evaluation.
Can. J. Plast. Surg., 15: 41-3, 2007.
19- de Araujo Cerqueira A.: Mammaplasty: breast fixation
with dermoglandular mono upper pedicle flap under the
pectoralis muscle. Aesthetic. Plast. Surg., 22: 276-283,
1998.
20- Qiao Q., Sun J., Liu C., Liu Z. and Zhao R.: Reduction
mammaplasty and correction of ptosis: Dermal bra technique.
Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 111: 1122-1130, 2003.
21- Baumeister R.G.: Curtain type combined pedicled reduction
mammaplasty with internal suspension for extensive
hypertrophic and ptotic breasts. Br. J. Plast. Surg., 56:
114-119, 2003.
22- Caldeira A.M. and Lucas A.: Pectoralis major muscle
flap: A new support approach to mammaplasty, personal
technique. Aesthetic. Plast. Surg., 24: 58-70, 2000.
23- Da Silva G.: Mastopexy with dermal ribbon for supporting
the breast and keeping it in shape. Plast. Reconstr .Surg.,
34: 403-405, 1964.
24- Lockwood T.: Reduction mammaplasty and mastopexy
with superficial fascial system suspension. Plast. Reconstr.
Surg., 103: 1411-1420, 1999.
25- Perez-Macias J.M.: Long-lasting evolution of ptosis control
after reduction mammaplasty using the hammock technique.
Aesthetic. Plast. Surg., 31: 266-274, 2007.
26- Widgerow A.D.: Breast reduction with inferior pedicle
fascial suspension. Aesthetic. Plast. Surg., 29: 53-537,
2005.
27- Lewis G.K.: A method of mastopexy with fascia lata
transplants. J. Int. Coll. Surg., 26: 346-353, 1956.
28- Goés J.C.S.: Periareolar mammaplasty: Double-skin
technique with application of Polyglactine 910 mesh.
Rev. Soc. Bras. Cir. Plast., 7: 1-3, 1992.
29- Goés J.C.S.: Periareolar mammaplasty: Double skin
technique with application of polyglactine or mixed mesh.
Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 97: 959-968, 1996.
30- Goés J.C.S.: Periareolar mastopexy and reduction with
mesh support. Breast Surg., 51: 697-708, 1998.
31- Goés J.C.S.: Periareolar mastopexy: Double skin technique
with mesh support. Aesthet. Surg. J., 3: 129-135, 2003.
32- Rohrich R.J., Thornton J.F. and Sorokin E.S.: Recurrent
Mammary Hyperplasia: Current Concepts. Plast. Reconstr.
Surg., 111: 1, Jan. 2003.