• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 49 (2025)
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 48 (2024)
Volume Volume 47 (2023)
Volume Volume 46 (2022)
Volume Volume 45 (2021)
Volume Volume 44 (2020)
Volume Volume 43 (2019)
Volume Volume 42 (2018)
Khachaba, Y., Al Shaheer, A., Zaki, H., Gad, S. (2025). Relationship between Injected Fat Volume and Gluteal Augmentation Outcomes: A Prospective Case Series. The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 49(3), 187-195. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2025.444129
Youcef A Khachaba; Abdalla Al Shaheer; Hatem H Zaki; Shaimaa Mostafa Gad. "Relationship between Injected Fat Volume and Gluteal Augmentation Outcomes: A Prospective Case Series". The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 49, 3, 2025, 187-195. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2025.444129
Khachaba, Y., Al Shaheer, A., Zaki, H., Gad, S. (2025). 'Relationship between Injected Fat Volume and Gluteal Augmentation Outcomes: A Prospective Case Series', The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 49(3), pp. 187-195. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2025.444129
Khachaba, Y., Al Shaheer, A., Zaki, H., Gad, S. Relationship between Injected Fat Volume and Gluteal Augmentation Outcomes: A Prospective Case Series. The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2025; 49(3): 187-195. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2025.444129

Relationship between Injected Fat Volume and Gluteal Augmentation Outcomes: A Prospective Case Series

Article 3, Volume 49, Issue 3, July 2025, Page 187-195  XML PDF (728.04 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejprs.2025.444129
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Youcef A Khachaba1; Abdalla Al Shaheer* 2; Hatem H Zaki1; Shaimaa Mostafa Gad* 1
1The Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University
2The Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University
Abstract
Background: Gluteal fat transfer has witnessed a rapid increase
in popularity, with fat transfer becoming an essential
used tool in aesthetic surgery. Many studies detailed the technique
of the procedure, while few explored the amount of fat
needed for optimum results.
This study aims to investigate the volume of fat
that needs to be injected into the buttock, about the
total surface area injected, and if that would be affected by the
presence of preoperative gluteal ptosis.
Methods: This study included 20 female patients seeking
glutleoplasty by fat transfer. Patients were assessed preoperatively,
and preoperative gluteal projection was recorded. They
underwent gluteal augmentation using autologous fat transfer.
Postoperatively, they were assessed, and postoperative gluteal
projection was recorded immediately, at 1-month, and 2-months.
The volume of fat injected per centimeter was calculated.
Results: The mean volume of injection per unit area within
the study was 5.24ml/cm2 (2.91-7.88ml/cm2). Mean postoperative
gluteal projection (immediately: 19.72cm, at 1-month:
20.90cm, at 2 months: 20.22 cm), was significantly higher than
the mean preoperative projection (16.92cm). The area of injection
was significantly higher in cases with ptosis (187cm2),
than in cases without ptosis (158.67cm2).
Conclusions: There was a significant improvement in postoperative
projection immediately, at 1 and 2 months, with theThe 
highest projection was achieved at 1-month postoperatively. TheThe 
mean volume of injection per unit area within the study was
5.24ml/cm2.
Keywords
Buttock; Augmentation; Fat grafting
Main Subjects
Aesthetics
References
Dai Y., Chen Y., Hu Y. and Zhang L.: Current Knowledge
and Future Perspectives of Buttock Augmentation: A Bibliometric
Analysis from 1999 to 2021. Aesthetic Plast
Surg., 47 (3): 1091-1103, 2023. doi:10.1007/s00266-022-
03140-x.
2- Rosique R.G. and Rosique M.J.F.: Augmentation Glutleoplasty:
A Brazilian Perspective. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 142
(4): 910-919, 2018. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000004809.
3- Fiedler L.S., Saleh D.B. and Mukrowsky A.: Autologous
fat grafting in the face and <scp>neck: Multinational</
scp> trends and knowledge of the safety, applications, and
indications considering oncologic risk potential. Laryngoscope
Investig Otolaryngol., 6 (5): 1024-1030, 2021.
doi:10.1002/lio2.649.
4- Khachaba Y., Ashour T., Aboul Nasr L. and Zamer S.:
Assessment of Different Modalities in Gluteoplasty. The
American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery, 36 (2): 57-70,
2019. doi:10.1177/0748806818793814.
5- Che D. hui and Xiao Z. bo: Gluteal Augmentation with Fat
Grafting: Literature Review. Aesthetic Plast. Surg., 45 (4):
1633-1641, 2021. doi:10.1007/s00266-020-02038-w.
6- Ghavami A., Villanueva N.L. and Amirlak B.: Gluteal
Ligamentous Anatomy and Its Implication in Safe Buttock
Augmentation. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 142 (2): 363-371,
2018. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000004588.
7- Mendieta C.G. and Sood A.: Classification System for
Gluteal Evaluation. Clin. Plast. Surg., 45 (2): 159-177,
2018. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2017.12.013.
8- Del Vecchio D.A., Villanueva N.L., Mohan R., Johnson
B., Wan D., Venkataram A., et al.: Clinical Implications
of Gluteal Fat Graft Migration: A Dynamic Anatomical
Study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 142 (5): 1180-1192, 2018.
doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000005020.
9- Oranges C.M., Tremp M., di Summa P.G., Haug M., Kalbermatten
D.F., Harder Y., et al.: Gluteal Augmentation
Techniques: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Aesthet
Surg. J., 37 (5): 560-569, 2017. doi:10.1093 /asj/sjw240.
10- Mendieta C. and Stuzin J.M.: Gluteal Augmentation and
Enhancement of the Female Silhouette: Analysis and
Technique. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 141 (2): 306-311, 2018.
doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000004094.
11- Wong W.W., Motakef S., Lin Y. and Gupta S.C.: Redefining
the Ideal Buttocks: A Population Analysis. Plast.
Reconstr. Surg., 137 (6): 1739-1747, 2016. doi:10.1097/
PRS.0000000000002192.
12- Gonzalez R.: Etiology, Definition, and Classification of
Gluteal Ptosis. Aesthetic Plast. Surg., 30 (3): 320-326,
2006. doi:10.1007/s00266-005-0051-y.
13- Aytaç S.: Submuscular Gluteal Augmentation and Lipoplasty
for Buttock Beautification. Plast. Reconstr.
Surg. Glob. Open., 9 (5): e3576, 2021. doi:10.1097/
GOX.0000000000003576.
14- Elsaftawy A., Ostrowski P., Bonczar M., Stolarski M., Gabryszuk
K. and Bonczar T.: Buttock Augmentation with
Ultrasonic Liposuction and Ultrasound-Guided Fat Grafting:
A Retrospective Analysis Based on 185 Patients. J.
Clin. Med., 13 (6): 1526, 2024. doi:10.3390/jcm13061526.
15- Singh D. and Randall P.K.: Beauty is in the eye of the
plastic surgeon: Waist–hip ratio (WHR) and women’s attractiveness.
Pers Individ Dif., 43 (2): 329-340, 2007. doi:
10.1016/j.paid.2006.12.003.
16- Sadideen H., Akhavani M.A., Mosahebi A. and Harris P.A.:
Current perceptions of ‘Brazilian butt lift’ (BBL) surgery
Egypt, J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., July 2025 195
in the UK: A BAAPS-led survey of BAAPS members.
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 73
(11): 1966-1975, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.08.068.
17- Abdul Nasser Khallaf: Buttock Augmentation with Fat
Tansfer: Experience with 200 Cases. European Journal
of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research, 4 (7): 118-124,
2017.
18- Willemsen J.C.N., Lindenblatt N. and Stevens H.P.J.D.:
Results and long-term patient satisfaction after gluteal
augmentation with platelet-rich plasma-enriched autologous
fat. Eur. J. Plast. Surg., 36 (12): 777-782, 2013.
doi:10.1007/s00238-013-0887-3.
19- Cansancao A.L., Condé-Green A., David J.A. and Vidigal
R.A.: Subcutaneous-Only Gluteal Fat Grafting: A Prospective
Study of the Long-Term Results with Ultrasound
Analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg., 143 (2): 447-451, 2019.
doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000005203.
20- Raposio E. Baldelli I., Vappiani M., Gualdi A. and Raposic
G.: The ideal buttock; Some aesthetic and morphometric
considerations Eur. J. Plast. Surg., 46: 915-21, 2023.
21- Swanson E.: Prospective Controlled Study of Buttock Fat
Transfer Using Ultrasound and Photographic Measurements.
Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open., 4 (5): e697,
2016. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000000700.
22- El Naggary A. and Aziz W.: Safety and Efficacy of Combined
Gluteal Lipofilling with Silicone Cohesive Implants
for Gluteal Enhancement in an Egyptian Population. The
Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery,
43 (3): 497-501, 2020. doi:10.21608/ejprs.2020.68205.
23- Ramon C.G. and Jorge Quezada: Mexico What Makes Buttock
Beautiful A Review and Classification of the Determinants
of Gluteal Beauty and The Surgical Techniques
to Achieve Them. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 28: 340-347,
2004.

Statistics
Article View: 33
PDF Download: 34
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.