The Reliability and Versatility of Facial Artery Perforator-Based Nasolabial Flaps in the Reconstruction of Lip Defects

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 The Department of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, New Valley University

2 The Department of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University

Abstract

Background: The lips are the active focal point of the lower
third of the face, making lip reconstruction a particularly
difficult task for a plastic surgeon. The goals of lip reconstruction
are both functional and aesthetic, and the surgical techniques
frequently overlap.
Objective: To assess the functional and aesthetic results
of facial artery perforator-based nasolabial flaps in the reconstruction
of lip defects, regarding flap survival and complications,
donor site morbidity, and the aesthetic outcome of the
flap and donor site.
Patients and Methods: Twenty patients participated in the
current study, which was conducted from January 2020 to January
2022 and included a six-month follow-up. Eight cases had
post-tumor resection lip defects. Twelve flaps had post-traumatic
defects; the defect size ranged from ½ to 2/3 of the lip < br />size.
Results: Twelve flaps survived completely; venous congestion
was treated conservatively in six flaps; two flaps required
debridement due to distal flap necrosis, reconstructed
by local flap advancement. In fifteen cases, the donor site scarIt 
was extremely good.
Conclusion: Nasolabial flaps based on the facial artery perforatorThey 
are easy to harvest, simple, and reliable. They offer a
satisfactory functional outcome with preservation of touch and
temperature sensitivity, particularly when the defect is accompanied
by substantial mucosal and cutaneous abnormalities.

Keywords

Main Subjects


1- Adams W. and Beran S.: Lip, cheek, and scalp reconstruction;
hair replacement. Selected Readings in Plastic Surgery,
15: 2–16, 2001.
2- Kroll S.: In: Kroll S., editor.: Reconstructive Plastic Surgery
for Cancer. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Year Book, Lip
reconstruction, pp. 201–209, 1996.
3- Nakajima H., Imanishi N. and Aiso S.: Facial artery in the
upper lip and nose: Anatomy and a clinical application.
Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 109 (3): 85-100, 2002.
4- Hofer S.o., Posch N.A. and Smit X.: The facial artery perforator
flap for reconstruction of perioral defects. Plast.
Reconstr. Surg., 115: 996–1003, 2005.
5- Cameron R.R., Latham W.D. and Dowling J.A.: Reconstructions
of the nose and upper lip with nasolabial flaps.
Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 52: 145–150, 1973.
6- Siddharth P., Ritesh P., Vivek K. and Shiv S.: Nasolabial
Perforator Flap for One-stage Reconstruction of Nasal
Defects, J. Cutan Aesthet. Surg., Jan-Mar. 10 (1): 22–27,
2017.
7- Matsuda H., Takahashi Y., Ichinose A., Miyazaki H. and
Kakizaki H.: Combination of nasolabial vy advancement
flap and glabellar subcutaneous pedicled flap for reconstruction
of medial canthal defect. Ophthalmol. Case Rep.,
5 (1): 50-3, 2014.
8- Funt D. and Pavicic T.: Dermal fillers in aesthetics: An
Overview of adverse events and treatment approaches.
Clin. Cosmet Investig D., 6: 295-8, 2013.
9- Rahpeyma A. and Khajehahmadi S.: The place of nasolabial
flap in orofacial reconstruction: A review. Ann. Med.
Surg.. (Lond), 12: 79-87, 2016.
Egypt, J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.., April 2025 97
10- Shetty R.K., Pradhan S., Kannan R., Doctor A., Surnare
K., Jondhale M., et al.: Clinical Profile and Quality of Life
Assessment of Oral Cancer Patients Following Nasolabial
Flap Reconstruction Surgery. Indian J. Otolaryngol. Head
Neck Surg., 72 (2): 200-7, 2020.
11- Camuzard O., Foissac R., Baque P., Bronsard N. and Poissonnet
G.: Facial artery perforator flap for reconstruction
of perinasal defects. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial
Surgery, 43: 2057-2065, 2015.
12- Yuanzhen Y., Tang X., Wang D., et al.: Propeller facial artery
perforator flap for repairing defect after resection of
skin malignant tumor at upper lip. Chinese Journal of Reparative
and Reconstructive Surgery, 32: 210-214, 2018.
13- Durgun M., Hulda R.C., Sari E., et al.: The versatile facial
artery perforator-based nasolabial flap in midface reconstruction.
J. Craniofac. Surg., 26: 1283-1286, 2015.
14- Miotti G., Rodda A. and Papa G.: Facial Artery Propeller
Flap for the Reconstruction of Upper Lip and Nostril: A
Case Report. Archives of Clinical and Medical Case Reports,
6: 381-387, 2022.
15- Abdelmofeed A.M. and Salama R.S.: Different modalities
of nasolabial flaps in nasal-defect reconstruction: Clinical
experience in 40 cases and review of literature. The Egyptian
Journal of Surgery, 40 (4): 1192-1204, 2021.
16- Aksam J., Gunnarsson G. and Thomsen J.: Comment on
“Sphincter-Sparing Excision and Reconstruction Using
Facial Artery Perforator Flaps for Lower Lip Carcinoma”
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 76: 1, 2018.
17- Shyamnath Krishna Pandian K.: Anatomical study of facial
artery perforator and its clinical application in oral
submucosal fibrosis (Doctoral dissertation, Madras Medical
College, Chennai), 2013.
18- Demirseren M.E., Afandiyev K. and Ceran C.: Reconstruction
of the perioral and perinasal defects with facial
artery perforator flaps Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive &
Aesthetic Surgery, 62: 1616e1620, 2009.
19- Gunnarsson G.L. and Thomsen J.B.: Freestyle facial perforator
flaps-a safe reconstructive option for moderate-sized
facial defects. Eur. J. Plast. Surg., 37 (6): 315-318, 2014.
20- Sohn W.I., Choi J.Y., Seo B.F. and Jung S.N.: Reconstruction
of nasal ala with nasolabial perforator flap after cancer
removal. Head Neck Oncol., 4 (4): 83, 2012.