• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 49 (2025)
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 48 (2024)
Volume Volume 47 (2023)
Volume Volume 46 (2022)
Volume Volume 45 (2021)
Volume Volume 44 (2020)
Volume Volume 43 (2019)
Volume Volume 42 (2018)
Elghamri, B., El Hadidy, M., Mansour, N. (2025). Is there a Relationship between Mandibular Gonial Angle and The Patterns of Mandibular Fractures? A Retrospective Study Based on 3D Measurements. The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 49(1), 77-80. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2025.407006
Belal Tayssir Elghamri; Mohamed Radwan El Hadidy; Nabil Mokhtar Mansour. "Is there a Relationship between Mandibular Gonial Angle and The Patterns of Mandibular Fractures? A Retrospective Study Based on 3D Measurements". The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 49, 1, 2025, 77-80. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2025.407006
Elghamri, B., El Hadidy, M., Mansour, N. (2025). 'Is there a Relationship between Mandibular Gonial Angle and The Patterns of Mandibular Fractures? A Retrospective Study Based on 3D Measurements', The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 49(1), pp. 77-80. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2025.407006
Elghamri, B., El Hadidy, M., Mansour, N. Is there a Relationship between Mandibular Gonial Angle and The Patterns of Mandibular Fractures? A Retrospective Study Based on 3D Measurements. The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2025; 49(1): 77-80. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2025.407006

Is there a Relationship between Mandibular Gonial Angle and The Patterns of Mandibular Fractures? A Retrospective Study Based on 3D Measurements

Article 10, Volume 49, Issue 1, January 2025, Page 77-80  XML PDF (315.7 K)
Document Type: Research article
DOI: 10.21608/ejprs.2025.407006
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Belal Tayssir Elghamri* ; Mohamed Radwan El Hadidy; Nabil Mokhtar Mansour
The Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University
Abstract
Background: Mandibular fractures usually involve one
or multiple sites with different patterns which depend on
various factors such as the force applied, type of injury, in
addition to the morphological and anatomical characteristics
of the mandible. Few studies proved a relationship between
mandibular angle measurement and fractures in the angle region.
In this study, we looked through the ties of gonial
angle measurement and all associated ipsilateral mandibular
fractures.
Objective: To investigate weather gonial angle measurement
would be one predictor to the location of mandibular
fractures.
Method: This retrospective cohort study included patients
diagnosed with mandibular fractures between 2018 and 2023.
100 cases were randomly selected. The gonial angle was measured
using 3D C.T. scans. Fracture patterns were categorized
into two groups: Group A (Angle region) and Group B (Not
Angle region).
Results: The mean gonial angle in patients with fractures
in the angle region was 125 degrees, compared to 117 degree
in patients with fractures in the non-angle region, which was a
statistically significant difference (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: The mandibular gonial angle is a powerful
determinant factor affecting the mandibular fracture pattern.
The stronger and less obtuse mandibular angle the more
likely a fracture pattern to spare the angle region.
Keywords
Gonial angle; Mandibular fractures; Computed tomography
Main Subjects
Maxillofacial and cranio-maxillo-facial surgery
References
Radabaugh J.P., Horn A.V., Chan S.A., Shelton J.M. and
Gal T.J.: Patient compliance following isolated mandibular
fracture repair, Laryngoscope, 127 (10): 2230–2235,
2017.
2- Dhara V., Kamath A.T. and Vineetha R.: The influence of
the mandibular gonial angle on the occurrence of mandibular
angle fracture, Dent. Traumatol., 35 (3): 188–193,
2019.
3- Al-Moraissi E.A., El-Sharkawy T.M., El-Ghareeb T.I. and
Chrcanovic B.R.: Three dimensional versus standard
miniplate fixation in the management of mandibular angle
fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Int. J.
Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 43 (6): 708–716, 2014.
4- Bereznyak Elias Y., Shilo D., Emodi O., Noy D. and Rachmiel
A.: The relation between morphometric features and
susceptibility to mandibular angle fractures, J. Craniofac.
Surg., 29 (7): e663–e665, 2018.
5- Shroff N., Motghare P., Kumbhare S. and Kalaskar A.: Correlation
of mandibular gonial angle and mandibular angle
fracture: A radiographic study, J. Indian Acad. Oral Med.
Radiol. 32 (1): 17–21, 2020.
6- Tiwari P., Bera R.N. and Chauhan N.: Magnitude of gonial
angle influence on the commonness of mandibular angle
fractures, Ann. Maxillofac. Surg., 10 (1): 190–194, 2020.
7- Semel G., Emodi O., Ohayon C., Ginini J.G. and Rachmiel
A.: The influence of mandibular gonial angle on fracture
site, J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 78 (8): 1366–1371, 2020.
8- Brucoli M., Boffano P., Pezzana A., Benech A., Corre P.,
Bertin H., et al.: The “European mandibular angle” research
project: The epidemiologic results from a multicenter
European collaboration, J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.,
77 (4): 791.e1–791.e7, 2019.
9- Yoon W.J., Kim S.G., Oh J.S., You J.S., Lim K.S., Shin
S.M. and Kim C.M.: A clinical study of mandibular angle
fracture, Maxillofac. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 36 (5):
201–206, 2014.
10- Sicher H. and DuBrul E.L.: Oral Anatomy. St Louis, MO,
Mosby, 1975.
11- Halazonetis J.A.: The ‘weak’ regions of the mandible. Br.
J. Oral Surg., 6: 37, 1968.
12- Dingman R. and Natvig P.: Surgery official fractures, W.
Saunders Company, USA. p. 142-144, 1969.
13- Upadhyay R.B., Upadhyay J., Agrawal P. and Rao N.N.:
Analysis of gonial angle in relation to age, gender, and
dentition status by radiological and anthropometric methods,
J. Forensic Dent. Sci., 4 (1): 29–33, 2012.
14- Kelly D.: A survey of facial fractures related to teeth and
edentulous regions. J. Oral Surg., 33:146, 1975.
15- Steadman P.: Why are most buildings rectangular? Arq:
Architectural Research Quarterly, 10 (2): pp. 119-130,
2006.
16- Osato S., Kuroyama I., Nakajima S., et al.: Differences in
5 anatomic parameters of mandibular body morphology
by gonial angle size in dentulous Japanese subjects. Ann.
Anat., 194: 446–451, 2012.
17- Elias Y.B., Shilo D., Emodi O., Noy D. and Rachmiel A.:
The relation between morphometric features and susceptibility
to mandibular angle fractures. J. Craniofac. Surg.,
29: 663-5, 2018.
18- Panneerselvam E., Prasad P.J., Balasubramaniam S., et al.:
The influence of the mandibular gonial angle on the incidence
of mandibular angle fracture A radiomorphometric
study. J. Oral Maxillofacial Surg., 75: 153, 2017

Statistics
Article View: 71
PDF Download: 73
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.