Comparative Study between Split Thickness Skin Graft and Split Thickness Dermal Graft in Coverage of Raw Areas

Emad, Ahmed; Abdelbaset, Mohamed S; Hashem, Reham E; Hawas, Emad; Elnaggar, Abdelnasser

doi:10.21608/ejprs.2023.284324

Comparative Study between Split Thickness Skin Graft and Split Thickness Dermal Graft in Coverage of Raw Areas

Document Type : Research article

Authors

¹ The Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Beni Suef University

² The Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal** University

10.21608/ejprs.2023.284324

Abstract

Background: Loss of skin integrity is one of the most
common problems in Plastic surgery. Split thickness skin
graft is the gold standard in coverage of raw areas but it
carries multiple complications like donor site morbidity. The
dermal graft may add another autologous option for wound
coverage with a concealed donor site scar.
Aim: The aim of our study is to assess the safety, limitations,
and complications of split thickness dermal graft in
coverage of raw areas and to compare it to the standard Split
thickness skin graft.
Patients and Methods: The study was conducted on 38
patients with raw areas, who attended the outpatient clinics
and Emergency Department of Plastic Surgery Department,
Beni-Suef University Hospital between October 2019 to
October 2021. The mean age was 50 years (range 5-55 years).
Raw areas were divided and covered by both split thickness
dermal graft (STDG) and split thickness skin graft (STSG).
Comparison of donor and recipient site of dermal graft and
the standard skin graft was documented using POSAS (Patient
Observer Scar Assessment Scale).
Results: The Split Thickness skin graft take was complete
in 37/38 cases. While Split Dermal Graft Take was complete
in 33/38 patients. Most Dermal graft failure occurred in large
raw areas. The scar of the dermal graft donor site was better
than the standard skin graft donor site regarding pain, itching,
color, and texture using POSAS.
Conclusion: Split thickness dermal graft had proved to
be a valuable adjunct and wholly autologous option in achieving
permanent raw areas coverage with decreased donor site
morbidity, especially in small sized raw areas.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Burns

References

Subrahamanyam M.: Honey dressings accelerate split
thickness skin graft donor site healing. Indian J. Surg.,
77 (Suppl 2): S261-S263, 2015.
2- Lauerman M.H., Scalea T.M., Eglseder W.A., Pensy R.,
Stein D.M. and Henry S.: Efficacy of Wound Coverage
Techniques in Extremity Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections.
Am. Surg., Nov. 01; 84 (11): 1790-1795, 2018.
3- Rotatori R.M., Starr B., Peake M., et al.: Prevalence and
Risk Factors for Hypertrophic Scarring of Split Thickness
Autograft Donor Sites in a Pediatric Burn Population.
Burns., Aug., 45 (5): 1066-1074, 2019.
4- Brown J.E. and Holloway S.L.: An evidence-based review
of split-thickness skin graft donor site dressings. Int.
Wound J., Dec. 15 (6): 1000-9, 2018.
5- Lee Y.J., Park M.C., Park D.H., Hahn H.M., Kim S.M.
and Lee I.J.: Effectiveness of Acellular Dermal Matrix
on Autologous Split-Thickness Skin Graft in Treatment
of Deep Tissue Defect: Esthetic Subjective and Objective
Evaluation. Aesthetic Plast Surg., May 19, 2017.
6- Oh S.J., Kim S.G., Cho J.K. and Sung C.M.: Palmar crease
release and secondary full-thickness skin grafts for contractures
in primary full-thickness skin grafts during
growth spurts in pediatric palmar hand burns. J. Burn
Care Res., Sep-Oct. 35 (5): e312-6, 2014.
7- Otene C.I., Olaitan P.B., Ogbonnaya I.S. and Nnabuko
R.E.: Donor site morbidity following harvest of split
thickness skin graft in south eastern Nigeria. J. West
African Coll. Surg., 86-96, 1 (2), 2011.
8- Nuutila K., Singh M., Kruse C. and Eriksson E.: Wound
healing from dermal grafts containing CD34+ cells are
comparable to wound healing with split thickness skin
micrografts. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 140 (2): 306-314,
2017.
9- Hynes W.: The skin-dermis graft as an alternative to the
direct or tubed flap. Br. J. Plast. Surg.,7: 97-107, 1954.
10- Rubis B.A., Danikas D., Neumeister M., Williams W.G.,
Suchy H. and Milner S.M.: The use of split-thickness
dermal grafts to resurface full thickness skin defects.
Burns., 28 (8): 752-9, 2002.
11- Andrew J. Lindford, Ilkka S. Kaartinen, Susanna Virolainen,
Hannu O. Kuokkanen and Jyrki Vuola: The dermis
graft: Another autologous option for acute burn wound
coverage. Burns., 38: 274-282, 2011.
12- Draaijers L.J., Tempelman F.R., Botman Y.A., Tuinebreijer
W.E., Middelkoop E., Kreis R.W., et al.: The patient and
observer scar assessment scale: A reliable and feasible
tool for scar evaluation. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 113: 1960-
1965, 2004.
13- Reed G.F., Zafra E., Ghyselen A.L., Goldstein J.C. and
Robinett W.V.: Self-epithelialisation of dermal grafts.
Arch. Otolaryngol., 87: 518-21, 1968.
14- Coruh A. and Yontar Y.: Application of split-thickness
dermal grafts in deep partial- and full-thickness burns: A
new source of auto-skin grafting. J. Burn Care Res., 33:
e94- e100, 2012.
15- Fratila A.A. and Bertlich R.: The reversed dermal graft:
surgical procedure and clinical applications. Facial Plast
Surg., 13 (2): 93-9, 1997.
16- Querings K., Bachter D. and Balda B.R.: Meshed reversed
dermal graft in patients with surgical defects of sole and
scalp: Technique and long-term results. Dermatol. Surg.,
28 (2): 122-6, 2002.
17- Kogan L. and Govrin-Yehudain J.: Vertical (two-layer)
skin grafting: New reserves for autologic skin. Ann. Plast.
Surg., 50 (5): 514-6, 2003.
18- Tanabe H.Y., Aoyagi A., Tai Y., Kiyokawa K. and Inoue
Y.: Reconstruction for palmar skin defects of the digits
and hand using plantar dermal grafting. Plast. Reconstr.
Surg., 101: 992-8, 1998.