The Influence of Recipient Breast Bed Quality on Fat Graft Survival

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 The Department of Plastic Surgery , Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt

2 The Departments of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt

3 The Departments of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt

Abstract

Background: Fat grafting has been established as an
effective method in both breast augmentation and addressing
deformities. Many factors related to donor area, process of
transfer and recipient area influence the survival of grafted
fat.
This work was done to assess objectively the influence
of recipient area on fat graft survival using mammography
and magnetic resonance imaging volumetry.
Methods: Forty patients seeking breast enhancement
procedures for various indications were classified into two
groups:
• Group A included thirty patients seeking augmentation or
symmetrization with no history of previous breast disease
or surgery.
• Group B included ten patients presenting for breast enhancement
following previous disease or surgery resulting obvious
deformity.
Radiological volume assessment was carried out preoperatively
and three months following last surgical procedure.
Fat harvesting, processing and transfer methods were standardized
so they do not affect the results. Statistical analysis
was carried out to assess survival rates and other variables
and relations according to recipient bed characteristics.
Results: In group A (aesthetic) the mean retention rate
was 56.3%±7.7 (range 37-67%), while in group B (reconstructive)
the mean retention rate was 48.8%±9.8 (range 33-66%)
that required multiple grafting sessions in 40% of cases. Also
it has been found that the larger the preoperative recipient
area was, the more fat graft survival was obtained. Imaging
modalities could evaluate postoperative complications.
Conclusion: The recipient bed characteristics are a major
determinant of fat graft survival being significantly lower in
previously pathological bed and hence multiple sessions are
frequently required.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Coleman S.R.: The technique of periorbital lipoinfiltration.
Oper. Tech. Plast. Surg., 1: 120, 1994.
2- Coleman S.R.: Long-term survival of fat transplants:
Controlled demonstrations. Aesthet. Plast. Surg., 19; 421,
1995.
3- Coleman S.R. and Saboeiro A.P.: Fat grafting to the breast
revisited: Safety and efficacy. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 119:
775 (2007).
4- Tuli R., Flynn R.A., Brill K.L., et al.: Diagnosis, treatment,
and management of breast cancer in previously augmented
women. Breast J., 12: 343, 2006.
5- Jewell M.I., Spear S.L., Largent J., et al.: Anaplastic large
T-cell lymphoma and breast implants: A reveiw of the
literature. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 128 (3): 651, 2011.
6- Salgarello M., Visconti G. and Farallo E.: Autologous fat
graft in radiated tissue prior to alloplastic reconstruction
of the breast: Report of two cases. Aesthetic Plast. Surg.,
34 (1); 5, 2010.
7- Coleman S.R. and Saboeiro A.P.: Lipoaugmentation. In:
Scott L. Spear (ed.). Surgery of the Breast; principles and
art. 3rd ed. Wolters Kluwer, p. 1366, 2011.
8- Sim Y.T. and Litherland J.C.: The use of imaging in
patients post breast reconstruction. Clin. Radiol., 67: 128,
2012.
9- Herold C., Ueberreiter K., Busche M., et al.: Autologous
Fat Transplantation: Volumetric Tools for Estimation of
Volume Survival. A Systematic Review. Aesth. Plast.
Surg., 37: 380, 2013.
10- Khouri R. and Vecchio D.: Breast augmentation and
reconstructon using BRAVA external breast expansion
and autologous fat grafting. In: Scott L. Spear, ed. Surgery
of The Breast; principles and art, 3rd ed. Wolter KLuwer,
p. 1374, 2011.
11- Kayar R., Civelek S., Cobanoglu M., et al.: Five methods
of breast volume measurement: A comparative study of
measurements of specimen volume in 30 mastectomy
cases. Breast Cancer, 5: 43, 2011.
12- Zheng D.N., Li Q.F., Lei H., et al.: Autologous fat grafting
to the breast for cosmetic enhancement: Experience in
66 patients with long-term follow-up. J. Plast. Reconstr.
Aesthet. Surg., 61 (7): 792, 2008.
158 Vol. 42, No. 1 / The Influence of Recipient Breast Bed Quality on Fat Graft Survival
13- Kamakura T. and Ito K.: Autologous Cell-Enriched Fat
Grafting for Breast Augmentation. International Society
of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2011.
14- Fa-Cheng L., Chen B. and Cheng L.: Breast Augmentation
With Autologous Fat Injection, a report of 105 cases.
Ann. Plast. Surg., 73 (Suppl 1): S37, 2014.
15- Spear S.L., Wilson H.B. and Lockwood M.D.: Fat injection
to correct contour deformities in the reconstructed breast.
Plastic Reconstr. Surg., 116: 1300, 2005.
16- Kanchwala S.K1, Glatt B.S., Conant E.F., et al.: Autologous
fat grafting to the reconstructed breast: The management
of acquired contour deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg.,
124 (2): 409, 2009.
17- Khouri R.K1, Rigotti G., Khouri R.K. Jr., et al.: Tissueengineered
breast reconstruction with Brava-assisted fat
grafting: A 7-year, 488-patient, multicenter experience.
Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 135 (3): 643, 2015.
18- Illouz G. and Sterodimas A.: Autologous Fat Transplantation
to the Breast: A Personal Technique with 25 Years
of Experience. international society of plastic surgeons,
2009.
19- Delay E., Garson S., Tousson G., et al.: Fat injection to
the breast: Techniques, results, and indications based on
880 procedures over 10 years. Aesthet. Surg. J., 29: 360
2009.
20- Khouri R.K., Eisenmann-Klein M., Eufemiano C.E., et
al.: Brava and Autologous Fat Transfer Is a Safe and
Effective Breast Augmentation Alternative: Results of a
6-Year, 81-Patient, Prospective Multicenter Study. Plast.
Reconstr. Surg., 129: 1173, 2012.
21- Yoshimura K., Asano Y., Aoi N., et al.: Progenitor-enriched
adipose tissue transplantation as rescue for breast implant
complications. Breast J., 16: 169, 2010.
22- Alexander R.W. and Abuzeni P.Z.: Enhancement of autologous
fat transplantation with platelet rich plasma. Am.
J. Cosmet. Surg., 18: 59, 2001