Home Articles List Article Information
The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 49 (2025)
Volume Volume 48 (2024)
Volume Volume 47 (2023)
Volume Volume 46 (2022)
Volume Volume 45 (2021)
Volume Volume 44 (2020)
Volume Volume 43 (2019)
Volume Volume 42 (2018)
Elmekkawy, I., Abdelbaki, S., Bahaa Eldin, A., El Hadidy, M., Zeina, A. (2021). Lower Pole Dermoglandular Flap Autoaugmentation versus Mastopexy Augmentation with Subpectoral Implants: Outcomes after Reshaping of Ptotic Breasts. The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 45(3), 157-167. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2021.183866
Issam Mohamed Elmekkawy; Shabieb A. Abdelbaki; Ahmed Mohamed Bahaa Eldin; Mohamed Radwan El Hadidy; Ahmed M. Zeina. "Lower Pole Dermoglandular Flap Autoaugmentation versus Mastopexy Augmentation with Subpectoral Implants: Outcomes after Reshaping of Ptotic Breasts". The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 45, 3, 2021, 157-167. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2021.183866
Elmekkawy, I., Abdelbaki, S., Bahaa Eldin, A., El Hadidy, M., Zeina, A. (2021). 'Lower Pole Dermoglandular Flap Autoaugmentation versus Mastopexy Augmentation with Subpectoral Implants: Outcomes after Reshaping of Ptotic Breasts', The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 45(3), pp. 157-167. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2021.183866
Elmekkawy, I., Abdelbaki, S., Bahaa Eldin, A., El Hadidy, M., Zeina, A. Lower Pole Dermoglandular Flap Autoaugmentation versus Mastopexy Augmentation with Subpectoral Implants: Outcomes after Reshaping of Ptotic Breasts. The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2021; 45(3): 157-167. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2021.183866

Lower Pole Dermoglandular Flap Autoaugmentation versus Mastopexy Augmentation with Subpectoral Implants: Outcomes after Reshaping of Ptotic Breasts

Article 7, Volume 45, Issue 3, July 2021, Page 157-167  XML PDF (26.07 MB)
Document Type: Research article
DOI: 10.21608/ejprs.2021.183866
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Issam Mohamed Elmekkawy* 1; Shabieb A. Abdelbaki2; Ahmed Mohamed Bahaa Eldin3; Mohamed Radwan El Hadidy3; Ahmed M. Zeina3
1Specialist of Plastic Surgery, Ministry of Health
2The Department of Urology, , Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Egypt
3Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Egypt
Abstract
Background: Single stage augmentation mastopexy is a
challenging procedure for both volume expansion and skin
envelope reduction. Also, the patient experience is an important
issue after mastopexy as it affects the patient physical functioning,
psychosocial wellbeing, and the aesthetic result.
Aim: To assess the outcomes of reshaping of a ptotic
breast and its impact on the quality of life.
Patients and Methods: This prospective comparative study
was conducted over a 2-year period in 32 female patients with
different degrees of breast ptosis. Patients were divided into
two groups according to their desire to increase breast volume
either using or not using an implant. Standard breast measurements
as well as early and late complications were recorded,
and patient satisfaction was assessed using the BREAST-Q.
Results: Postoperatively, both the groups showed significant
improvements in ptosis and in the BREAST-Q scores
compared to pre-operative scores in all domains (p£0.001).
However, regarding post-operative satisfaction with breast
volume, psychosocial wellbeing, and outcomes, the autoaugmentation
group showed a significantly higher BREAST-Q
score compared with the implant augmentation group (p£0.05).
Conclusion: The BREAST-Q provides significant clinical
information and evaluates the influence of the surgical procedure
on the patient's regular life activities. Mastopexy autoaugmentation
using the lower pole dermoglandular flap is a
reliable technique for enhancing the projection of the breast,
improving the upper pole shape, and creating an adequate
breast volume with a low complication rate and high patient
satisfaction.
Keywords
Augmentation; Autoaugmentation; Breast; Mastopexy augmentation; Implant; Ptosis; Quality of life; Satisfaction
Main Subjects
Aesthetics
References
Rubin J.P. and Khachi G.: Mastopexy after massive weight
loss: dermal suspension and selective auto-augmentation.
Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 35 (1): 123-129, 2008.
2- Wueringer E. and TschabitscheR M.: New aspects of the
topographical anatomy of the mammary gland regarding
its neurovascular supply along a regular ligamentous
suspension. European journal of morphology 40 (3): 181-
189, 2002.
3- Regnault P.: Breast ptosis: Definition and treatment. Clin.
Plast. Surg., 3: 193-203. 1976.
4- Khavanin N., Jordan S.W., Rambachan A. and Kim J.Y.:
A systematic review of singlestageaugmentationmastopexy.
Plasticand Reconstructive Surgery, 134 (5): 922-
931, 2014.
Egypt, J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., July 2021 167
5- Troy, Jared, Little, Andrea, Kuykendall, Lauren, Dayicioglu
and Deniz: Flap-Mastopexy in Autologous Breast Reconstruction:
Timing and Technique. Annals of Plastic Surgery,
80 (4): 328-332, 2018.
6- Hall-Findlay E.J.: Aesthetic Breast Surgery: Concepts
and Techniques. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishing,
429-514, 2011.
7- Di Summa P.G., Oranges C.M., Watfa W., Sapino G.,
Keller N., Tay S.K., Chew B.K., Schaefer D.J. and Raffoul
W.: Systematic review of outcomes and complications in
nonimplant-based mastopexy surgery. Journal of Plastic,
Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 72 (2): 243-272,
2019.
8- Karacaoglu and Ercan: Single Stage Augmentation Mastopexy:
A Novel Technique Using Autologous Dermal
Graft. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 63 (6): 600-604, 2009.
9- Ors S.: Augmentation Mastopexy with a Dermal Encapsulated
Round or Anatomic Autoprosthesis. Aesthetic
Plastic Surgery, 42 (1): 88-97, 2018.
10- Cano S.J., Klassen A.F., Scott A.M. and Pusic A.L.: A
closer look at the BREAST-Q©. Clinics in Plastic Surgery,
40 (2): 287-296, 2013.
11- Abboud L., Watfa W., di Summa P.G. and Raffoul W.: An
original and simple autoaugmentation mastopexy in mild
to moderate breast ptosis: Superior pedicle frontal division
to achieve upper pole fullness. Gland Surgery, 6 (6): 751-
752, 2017.
12- Grünherz L., Burger A., Giovanoli P. and Lindenblatt N.:
Long-term results measured by BREAST-Q reveal higher
patient satisfaction after "autoimplant-mastopexy" than
augmentation-mastopexy. Gland Surgery, 8 (5): 516-526,
2019.
13- American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS): Plastic-
Surgery-Statistics-Full-Report-2019. 1-25. https://
www.plasticsurgery.org/news/plastic-surgery-statistics.
Accessed October 11, 2020.
14- Ribeiro L.: A new technique for reduction mammaplasty.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 55 (3): 330-334, 1975.
15- Graf R. and Biggs T.M.: In search of better shape in
mastopexy and reduction mammoplasty. Plastic and Reconstructive
Surgery, 110 (1): 309-322, 2002.
16- Ritz M., Silfen R. and Southwick G.: Fascial suspension
mastopexy. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 117 (1):
86-94, 2006.
17- Botti G.: Vertical scar mammaplasty: Stable padding of
the superior pole by means of a posteriorly based pedicle
autoprosthesis. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 19 (2): 116-
123, 1999.
18- Colwell, Amy, Breuing and Karl: Improving Shape and
Symmetry in Mastopexy With Autologous or Cadaveric
Dermal Slings. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 61 (2): 138-
142, 2008.
19- Kelemen N., Kannan R.Y. and Offer G.J.: A stacked
technique of mastopexy: Volume redistribution mastopexy
with inferior flap and superomedially based pedicle.
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 37 (2): 349-353, 2013.
20- Hammond D.C. and O'Connor E.A.: The lower island
flap transposition (LIFT) technique for control of the
upper pole in circumvertical mastopexy. Plastic and
Reconstructive Surgery, 134(4): 655-660, 2014.
21- Kirwan L., Wazir U. and Mokbel K.: Breast Auto-
Augmentation: A Versatile Method of Breast Rehabilitation;
Retrospective Series of 107 Procedures. Archives
of Plastic Surgery, 42 (4): 438-445, 2015.
22- Lang Stumpfle, Rubem, Piccinini, Pedro, Pereira-Lima,
Lucas, Valiati and Andre: Muscle-Splitting Augmentation-
Mastopexy: Implant Protection with an Inferior Dermoglandular
Flap. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 82 (2): 137-144,
2019.
23- Pirro O., Mestak O., Vindigni V., Sukop A., Hromadkova
V., Nguyenova A., Vitova L. and Bassetto F.: Comparison
of Patient-reported Outcomes after Implant Versus Autologous
Tissue Breast Reconstruction Using the BREASTQ.
Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global Open, 5 (1):
e1217, 2017.
24- Vindigni V., Scarpa C., Tommasini A., Toffanin M.C.,
Masetto L., Pavan C. and Bassetto F.: Breast Reshaping
Following Bariatric Surgery. Obesity Surgery, 25 (9):
1735-1740, 2015.

Statistics
Article View: 343
PDF Download: 650