Scarpa Fascia versus Rectus Sheath Plane in Lipoabdominoplasty Flap Dissection: Comparative Study

Elwakeel, Helmy; Abouarab, Mohamed H; Kholosy, Hassan M.

doi:10.21608/ejprs.2021.183830

Scarpa Fascia versus Rectus Sheath Plane in Lipoabdominoplasty Flap Dissection: Comparative Study

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

The Department of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Egypt

10.21608/ejprs.2021.183830

Abstract

Background: Abdominoplasty and lipoabdominoplasty
are frequently performed aesthetic procedures to improve the
contour of the abdomen and flanks. The improvement obtained
would positively impact the patient's self-image and life
quality. A lot of potential complications would compromise
surgeon/patient satisfaction, the most frequent being seroma
formation. A lot of measures/techniques were advocated to
reduce seroma incidence including the use of suction drain,
dead space obliteration by quilting sutures, and preservation
of infraumbilical Scarpa fascia/deep fat layer. The latter is
the focus of the current comparative study.
Patients and Methods: 40 full lipoabdominoplasty cases
were randomized into 2 equal groups based on the infraumbilical
dissection plane. Group A with traditional rectus sheath
dissection plane and group B with supra Scarpa dissection
plane. Post-operative drainage volume, time of drain removal,
and incidence of symptomatic seromas were documented.
Results: Drainage volume and duration of drainage were
significantly lower in the supra Scarpa dissection group (B)
than those of the rectus plane group (A) (p < 0.001). Clinically
evident seroma was detected in 3 cases of group (A) and one
case of group (B). All resolved after 2-3 aspirations in outpatient
settings. Both groups were homogenous regarding BMI,
age, volume of lipoaspirate, weight of excised dermofat and
mean operative time.
Conclusion: Scarpa fascia/deep fat preservation significantly
reduced the drainage volume and duration. A lower
seroma incidence was also observed.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Aesthetics

References

REFERENCES
1- International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. ISAPS
global statistics: The international study on aesthetic/
cosmetic procedures performed in 2019. Available at:
https:// www.isaps.org/medical-professionals/isaps-globalstatistics/.
Accessed Dec 2020.
2- Uchelen J.H., Werker P.M. and Kon M.: Complications
of abdominoplasty in 86 patients. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.,
107: 1869-1873, 2001.
3- Stewart K.J., Stewart D.A., Coghlan B., Harrison D.H.,
Jones B.M. and Waterhouse N.: Complications of 278
consecutive abdominoplasties. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet.
Surg., 59: 1152-1155, 2006.
4- Hensel J.M., Lehman J.A. Jr., Tantri M.P., Parker M.G.,
Wagner D.S. and Topham N.S.: An outcome analysis and
satisfaction survey of 199 consecutive abdominoplasties.
Ann. Plast. Surg., 46: 357-363, 2001.
5- Kim J. and Stevenson T.R.: Abdominoplasty, liposuction
of the flanks, and obesity: Analyzing risk factors for
seroma formation. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 117: 773-779;
discussion 780-781, 2006.
6- Zimman O.A., Butto C.D. and Ahualli P.E.: Frequency
of seroma in abdominal lipectomies. Plast. Reconstr.
Surg., 108: 1449-1451, 2001.
7- Ali A., Elbarbary A.S., Farag M. and Saleh M.A.: Technical
Considerations in Abdominoplasty of Huge Abdomen.
The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery, 29 (4): 252-
259, 2012.
8- Le Louarn C.: Partial subfascial abdominoplasty. Aesthetic
Plast. Surg., 20: 123-127, 1996.
9- Saldanha O.R., Pinto E.B.S, Matos W.N., et al.: Lipoabdominoplasty
without undermining. Aesthet. Surg. J., 21:
518, 2001.
10- Saldanha O.R., De Souza Pinto E.B., Mattos W.N., et al.:
Lipoabdominoplasty with selective and safe undermining.
Aesthetic Plast. Surg., 27: 322-327, 2003.
11- Fang R.C., Lin S.J. and Mustoe T.A.: Abdominoplasty
flap elevation in a more superficial plane: Decreasing the
need for drains. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 125 (2): 677-82,
2010.
12- Costa-Ferreira A., Rebelo M., Vásconez L.O. and Amarante
J.: Scarpa fascia preservation during abdominoplasty: A
prospective study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 125: 1232-1239,
2010.
13- Costa-Ferreira A., Rebelo M., Silva A., Vásconez L.O.
and Amarante J.: Scarpa fascia preservation during abdominoplasty:
Randomized clinical study of efficacy and
safety. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 131: 644-651, 2013.
Egypt, J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., July 2021 119
14- Koller M. and Hintringer T.: Scarpa fascia or rectus fascia
in abdominoplasty flap elevation: A prospective clinical
trial. Aesthetic Plast. Surg., 36 (2): 241-243, 2012.
15- Di Martino M., Nahas F.X., Barbosa M.V., et al.: Seroma
in lipoabdominoplasty and abdominoplasty: A comparative
study using ultrasound. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 126: 1742-
1751, 2010.
16- Andrades P., Prado A., Danilla S., et al.: Progressive
tension sutures in the prevention of post abdominoplasty
seroma: A prospective randomized double-blind clinical
trial. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 120: 935-946; discussion
947-951, 2007.
17- Mladick R.A.: Progressive tension sutures to reduce
complications in abdominoplasty. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.,
107: 619-623, 2001.
18- Pollock H. and Pollock T.: Progressive tension sutures:
A technique to reduce local complications in abdominoplasty.
Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 105: 2583-2586; discussion
2587-2588, 2000.
19- Pollock T. and Pollock H.: Progressive tension sutures in
abdominoplasty. Clin. Plast. Surg., 31: 583-589, 2004.
20- Khan U.D.: Risk of seroma with simultaneous liposuction
and abdominoplasty and the role of progressive tension
sutures. Aesthetic Plast. Surg., 32: 93-99; discussion 100,
2008.
21- Kulber D.A., Bacilious N., Peters E.D., Gayle L.B. and
Hoffman L.: The use of fibrin sealant in the prevention
of seroma. Plast. Reconst. Surg., 99: 842, 1997.
22- Costa-Ferreira A., Rodrigues-Pereira P., Rebelo M.,
Vásconez L.O. and Amarante J.: Morphometric study
(macroscopic and microscopic) of the lower abdominal
wall. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 134: 1313-1322, 2014.
23- Lancerotto L., Stecco C., Macchi V., Porzionato A., Stecco
A. and De Caro R.: Layers of the abdominal wall: Anatomical
investigation of subcutaneous tissue and superficial
fascia. Surg. Radiol. Anat., 33: 835-842, 2011.
24- Tourani S.S., Taylor G. and Ashton M.W.: Scarpa Fascia
Preservation in Abdominoplasty: Does It Preserve the
Lymphatics? Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 136: 258-268, 2015.
25- Costa-Ferreira A., Rebelo M., Vásconez L. and Amarante
J.: Scarpa fascia preservation during abdominoplasty. In:
Di Giuseppe A., Shiffman M.A., eds. Aesthetic Plastic
Surgery of the Abdomen. Cham, Switzerland: Springer,
pp. 59-73, 2015.
26- Novais C.S., Carvalho J., Valença-Filipe R., et al.: Abdominoplasty
with Scarpa Fascia Preservation: Randomized
Controlled Trial with Assessment of Scar Quality
and Cutaneous Sensibility. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 146:
156e, 2020.
27- Stoff A.: Comparing the ultrasonically activated scalpel
(harmonic) with high-frequency electrocautery for postoperative
serous drainage in massive weight loss surgery.
Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 120: 1092, 2007.
28- Saldanha O.R., Federico R., Daher P.F., et al.: Lipoabdominoplasty.
Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 124: 934, 2009.
29- Costa-Ferreira A., Rebelo M., Vásconez L.O., Amarante
J.: Abdominoplasty with Scarpa Fascia Preservation. Ann.
Plast. Surg., 76: S264-S274, 2016.