• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 49 (2025)
Volume Volume 48 (2024)
Volume Volume 47 (2023)
Volume Volume 46 (2022)
Volume Volume 45 (2021)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 44 (2020)
Volume Volume 43 (2019)
Volume Volume 42 (2018)
Ibrahim, M., Farag, M. (2021). Correlation of the Oncoplastic Excision Volumes with the Aesthetic Outcomes for the Upper Outer Quadrant Breast Cancer. The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 45(2), 59-65. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2021.173827
Mohamed Ibrahim; Mohamed Farag. "Correlation of the Oncoplastic Excision Volumes with the Aesthetic Outcomes for the Upper Outer Quadrant Breast Cancer". The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 45, 2, 2021, 59-65. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2021.173827
Ibrahim, M., Farag, M. (2021). 'Correlation of the Oncoplastic Excision Volumes with the Aesthetic Outcomes for the Upper Outer Quadrant Breast Cancer', The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 45(2), pp. 59-65. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2021.173827
Ibrahim, M., Farag, M. Correlation of the Oncoplastic Excision Volumes with the Aesthetic Outcomes for the Upper Outer Quadrant Breast Cancer. The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2021; 45(2): 59-65. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2021.173827

Correlation of the Oncoplastic Excision Volumes with the Aesthetic Outcomes for the Upper Outer Quadrant Breast Cancer

Article 2, Volume 45, Issue 2, April 2021, Page 59-65  XML PDF (5.44 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejprs.2021.173827
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Mohamed Ibrahim email orcid ; Mohamed Farag
The Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University
Abstract
Background: Oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS) has
emerged as more advanced surgical approaches which combine
the principles of both the oncological and plastic surgeries to
achieve those advanced results and to expand the tumour size
indication in front of the conservative management.
Methods: From July 2016 to March 2019, 200 patients
presented with UOQ primary breast cancer including multifocal
and post neoadjuvant cases with predicted excision volume
(PEV) less than 35% were operated and enrolled in this
prospective study. Aesthetic outcomes were objectively evaluated
6 months after surgery by the semi-automated Breast
Cancer Conservative Treatment (BCCT) core software.
Results: Total aesthetic results according to the objective
BCCT core assessment were excellent in 41.5% (83 cases),
good in 29.5% (59 cases), fair in 19.5% (39 cases), and poor
in 9.5% (19 cases). More than 90% of the patients with EEV
less than 10% have achieved excellent aesthetic results; EEV
from 10 to 15% has achieved more than 60% good results;
EEV from 15 to 20% has achieved around 50% fair results
which have been approached the 70% in the 20 to 25% group;
more than 40% poor results were noticed in the 25 to 30%
EEV which were raised up to 75% in the 30 to 35% EEV.
Conclusion: Excision volume ratio has become one of
the main determinants of the aesthetic results; its preoperative
value can refer to the most suitable oncoplastic surgical
technique for each patient, expect the forthcoming discrepancy
and the necessity for contralateral symmetrization. Current
study has revealed the necessity of discrepancy corrective
surgery or performing volume replacement reconstruction
with the EEV more than 20% in the UOQ and from 15 to 20%
in the fair results according to the patients' preference.
Main Subjects
Aesthetics; Reconstructive surgery
Full Text

Aesthetic outcomes – Oncoplastic surgery –
Excision volumes – Upper outer quadrant – Breast
cancer.

References
Fisher B., Anderson S., Bryant J., Margolese R., Deutsch
M., Fisher E., Jeong J. and Wolmark N.: Twenty-Year
Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Total Mastectomy,
Lumpectomy, and Lumpectomy plus Irradiation
for the Treatment of Invasive Breast Cancer. New England
Journal of Medicine, 347 (16): pp. 1233-1241, 2002.
2- Kronowitz S., Feledy J., Hunt K., Kuerer H., Youssef
A., Koutz C. and Robb G.: Determining the Optimal
Approach to Breast Reconstruction after Partial Mastectomy.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 118 (3): pp.
814-815, 2006.
3- Struikmans H., Bartelink H., Horiot J., Poortmans P., Van
den Bogaert W., Fourquet A., Jager J., Hoogenraad W.,
Bing Oei S., Wárlám-Rodenhuis C., Pierart M. and Collette
L.: Impact of a higher radiation dose on local control and
survival in breast-conserving therapy of early breast
cancer: 10-year results of the Randomized Boost Versus
No Boost. European Journal of Cancer Supplements, 25
(22): pp. 3259-3265, 2007.
4- Pukancsik D., Kelemen P., Újhelyi M., Kovács E., Udvarhelyi
N., Mészáros N., Kenessey I., Kovács T., Kásler M.
and Mátrai Z.: Objective decision making between conventional
and oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery or
mastectomy: An aesthetic and functional prospective
cohort study. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 43
(2): pp. 303-310, 2017.
5- Santos G., Urban C., Edelweiss M., Zucca-Matthes G.,
de Oliveira V., Arana G., Iera M., Rietjens M., de Lima
R., Spautz C., Kuroda F., Anselmi K. and Capp E.: Long-
Term Comparison of Aesthetical Outcomes After Oncoplastic
Surgery and Lumpectomy in Breast Cancer Patients.
Annals of Surgical Oncology, 22 (8): pp. 2500-2508,
2014.
6- Heil J., Czink E., Golatta M., Schott S., Hof H., Jenetzky
E., Blumenstein M., Maleika A., Rauch G. and Sohn C.:
Change of aesthetic and functional outcome over time
and their relationship to quality of life after breast conserving
therapy. European Journal of Surgical Oncology,
37 (2): pp. 116-121, 2011.
7- De Lorenzi F., Loschi P., Bagnardi V., Rotmensz N.,
Hubner G., Mazzarol G., Orecchia R., Galimberti V.,
Veronesi P., Colleoni M., Toesca A., Peradze N. and Mario
R.: Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery for Tumors
Larger than 2 Centimeters: Is it Oncologically Safe? A
Matched-Cohort Analysis. Annals of Surgical Oncology,
23 (6): pp. 1852-1859, 2016.
8- Wijgman D., ten Wolde B., van Groesen N., Keemers-
Gels M., van den Wildenberg F. and Strobbe L.: Short
term safety of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery for
larger tumors. European Journal of Surgical Oncology,
43 (4): pp. 665-671, 2017.
9- Ojala K., Meretoja T. and Leidenius M.: Aesthetic and
functional outcome after breast conserving surgery -
Comparison between conventional and oncoplastic resection.
European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 43 (4): pp.
658-664, 2017.
10- Malycha P., Gough I., Margaritoni M., Deo S., Sandelin
K., Buccimazza I. and Agarwal G.: Oncoplastic Breast
Surgery: A Global Perspective on Practice, Availability,
64 Vol. 45, No. 2 / Oncoplastic Excision Volumes & Aesthetic Outcomes
and Training. World Journal of Surgery, 32 (12): pp. 2570-
2577, 2008.
11- Pires D., Junior O., Valadares C. and Andrade R.: Training
in oncoplastic and reconstructive breast surgery: Analysis
of training in America and in the European Union with
the brazilian reality. Revista Brasileira de Mastologia, 27
(2): pp. 164-171, 2017.
12- Campbell E. and Romics L.: Oncological safety and
cosmetic outcomes in oncoplastic breast conservation
surgery, a review of the best level of evidence literature.
Breast Cancer: Targets and Therapy, 9: pp. 521-530, 2017.
13- Singletary S.: Surgical margins in patients with earlystage
breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy.
The American Journal of Surgery, 184 (5): pp. 383-
393, 2002.
14- Masetti R., Di Leone A., Franceschini G., Magno S.,
Terribile D., Fabbri M. and Chiesa F.: Oncoplastic Techniques
in the Conservative Surgical Treatment of Breast
Cancer: An Overview. The Breast Journal, 12 (s2): pp.
S174-S180, 2006.
15- Emiroglu M., Sert I. and Inal A.: The Role of Oncoplastic
Breast Surgery in Breast Cancer Treatment. The Journal
of Breast Health, 11 (1): pp. 1-9, 2015.
16- Lanitis S. and Hadjiminas D.: Oncoplastic surgery: Taking
breast surgery to the next level. Hellenic Journal of
Surgery, 84 (2): pp. 92-105, 2012.
17- Dahlbäck C., Manjer J., Rehn M. and Ringberg A.: Determinants
for patient satisfaction regarding aesthetic
outcome and skin sensitivity after breast-conserving
surgery. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 14 (1): pp.
17-28, 2016.
18- Dos Santos G. and Urban C.: Aesthetics and Quality of
Life after Breast Reconstruction. In: C. Urban and M.
Rietjens, ed., Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast
Surgery, 1st ed. Milan: Springer-Verlag, pp. 431-440,
2013.
19- Down S., Jha P., Burger A. and Hussien M.: Oncological
Advantages of Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery
in Treatment of Early Breast Cancer. The Breast Journal,
19 (1), pp. 56-63, 2013.
20- Noguchi M., Yokoi-Noguchi M., Ohno Y., Morioka E.,
Nakano Y., Kosaka T. and Kurita T.: Oncoplastic breast
conserving surgery: Volume replacement vs. volume
displacement. European Journal of Surgical Oncology,
42 (7): pp. 926-934, 2016.
21- Lee A.: Why is carcinoma of the breast more frequent in
the upper outer quadrant? A case series based on needle
core biopsy diagnoses. The Breast, 14 (2): pp. 151-152,
2005.
22- Rummel S., Hueman M., Costantino N., Shriver C. and
Ellsworth R.: Tumour location within the breast: Does
tumour site have prognostic ability?. Ecancer Medical
Science, 9 (552): pp. 1-10, 2015.
23- Cochrane R., Valasiadou P., Wilson A., Al-Ghazal S. and
Macmillan R.: Cosmesis and satisfaction after breastconserving
surgery correlates with the percentage of breast
volume excised. British Journal of Surgery, 90 (12): pp.
1505-1509, 2003.
24- Chan S., Chueng P. and Lam S.: Cosmetic Outcome and
Percentage of Breast Volume Excision in Oncoplastic
Breast Conserving Surgery. World Journal of Surgery, 34
(7): pp. 1447-1452, 2009.
25- Kayar R., Civelek S., Cobanoglu M., Gungor O., Catal
H. and Emiroglu M.: Five Methods of Breast Volume
Measurement: A Comparative Study of Measurements of
Specimen Volume in 30 Mastectomy Cases. Breast Cancer:
Basic and Clinical Research, 5: pp. 43-52, 2011.
26- Cardoso J. and Cardoso M.: Towards an intelligent medical
system for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative
treatment. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine,
40 (2): pp. 115-126, 2007.
27- White J., Achuthan R., Turton P. and Lansdown M.: Breast
Conservation Surgery: State of the Art. International
Journal of Breast Cancer, 20 (11): pp. 1-10, 2011.
28- Yang J., Bae S., Chung H., Cho B., Park H. and Jung J.:
The Usefulness of Oncoplastic Volume Displacement
Techniques in the Superiorly Located Breast Cancers for
Korean Patients with Small to Moderate-Sized Breasts.
Annals of Plastic Surgery, 67 (5): pp. 474-480, 2011.
29- Munhoz A., Montag E. and Gemperli R.: Oncoplastic
breast surgery: Indications, techniques and perspectives.
Gland surgery, 2 (3): pp. 143-157, 2013.
30- Kalbhen C., McGill J., Fendley P., Corrigan K. and
Angelats J.: Mammographic determination of breast
volume: Comparing different methods. American Journal
of Roentgenology, 173 (6): pp. 1643-1649, 1999.
31- Kim M., Sbalchiero J., Reece G., Miller M., Beahm E.
and Markey M.: Assessment of Breast Aesthetics. Plastic
and Reconstructive Surgery, 121 (4): pp. 186e-194e, 2008.
32- Cardoso M., Cardoso J., Vrieling C., Macmillan D.,
Rainsbury D., Heil J., Hau E. and Keshtgar M.: Recommendations
for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer
conservative treatment. Breast Cancer Research and
Treatment, 135 (3): pp. 629-637, 2012.
33- Haloua M., Krekel N., Jacobs G., Zonderhuis B., Bouman
M., Buncamper M., Niessen F., Winters H., Terwee C.,
Meijer S. and van den Tol M.: Cosmetic Outcome Assessment
following Breast-Conserving Therapy: A Comparison
between BCCT.core Software and Panel Evaluation.
International Journal of Breast Cancer, pp. 1-7, 2014.
34- Cardoso M., Oliveira H. and Cardoso J.: Assessing cosmetic
results after breast conserving surgery. Journal of
Surgical Oncology, 110 (1): pp. 37-44, 2014.
35- Yu T., Eom K., Jang N., Kim K., Koo T., Kwon J., Kim
B., Kang E., Kim S., Kim J. and Kim I.: Objective Measurement
of Cosmetic Outcomes of Breast Conserving
Therapy Using BCCT.core. Cancer Research and Treatment,
48 (2): pp. 491-498, 2016.
36- Campbell E. and Romics L.: Oncological safety and
cosmetic outcomes in oncoplastic breast conservation
surgery, a review of the best level of evidence literature.
Breast Cancer: Targets and Therapy, 9: pp. 521-530, 2017.
37- Bulstrode N. and Shrotria S.: Prediction of cosmetic
outcome following conservative breast surgery using
breast volume measurements. The Breast, 10 (2): pp. 124-
126, 2001.
38- Masetti R., Di Leone A., Franceschini G., Magno S.,
Terribile D., Fabbri M. and Chiesa F.: Oncoplastic TechEgypt,
J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., April 2021 65
niques in the Conservative Surgical Treatment of Breast
Cancer: An Overview. The Breast Journal, 12 (s2): pp.
S174-S180, 2006.
39- Chan S., Chueng P. and Lam S.: Cosmetic Outcome and
Percentage of Breast Volume Excision in Oncoplastic
Breast Conserving Surgery. World Journal of Surgery, 34
(7): pp. 1447-1452, 2009.
40- Ogawa T., Hanamura N., Yamashita M., Kimura H. and
Kashikura Y.: Breast-Volume Displacement Using an
Extended Glandular Flap for Small Dense Breasts. Plastic
Surgery International, pp. 1-7, 2011.
41- Emiroglu M., Sert I. and Inal A.: The Role of Oncoplastic
Breast Surgery in Breast Cancer Treatment. The Journal
of Breast Health, 11 (1): pp. 1-9, 2015

Statistics
Article View: 299
PDF Download: 485
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.