Ali, A. (2020). Epidemiological Study of Zygomatic Fractures: A Five-Year Retrospective Analysis in a Single Hospital Experience. The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 44(4), 527-533. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2020.140021
Ahmed A A Ali. "Epidemiological Study of Zygomatic Fractures: A Five-Year Retrospective Analysis in a Single Hospital Experience". The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 44, 4, 2020, 527-533. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2020.140021
Ali, A. (2020). 'Epidemiological Study of Zygomatic Fractures: A Five-Year Retrospective Analysis in a Single Hospital Experience', The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 44(4), pp. 527-533. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2020.140021
Ali, A. Epidemiological Study of Zygomatic Fractures: A Five-Year Retrospective Analysis in a Single Hospital Experience. The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2020; 44(4): 527-533. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2020.140021
Epidemiological Study of Zygomatic Fractures: A Five-Year Retrospective Analysis in a Single Hospital Experience
The Department of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, South Valley University
Abstract
Background: Zygomatic complex and arch fractures remain one of the most common maxillofacial fractures. Epidemiological studies of theses fractures vary by geographic region, socioeconomic, environmental and cultural factors. Its importance is confirmed by their implication in the clinical practice and prevention. Patients and Methods: Five-year retrospective study; from May 2015 to April 2020; was conducted on 120 patients with zygomatic fractures in our department. Fracture sites were classified into five types (I-V) based on the number of fractured processes and comminution. Data collected in a clinical sheet and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 20. p-value Chi square test was used to compare between 2 or more qualitative variables. Results: Patients aged from 15-78 years old and divided into 4 age groups (A-D). Group B (21-40 years) was the commonest affected. Males were predominant than females with ratio M: F = (7:1). Motor car accidents was the commonest etiology of trauma (56.60%). Left sided fracture (52.5%) was involved more than right sided one (45%) and fracture was bilateral in 2.5% of cases. Type-IV fracture (classic tetrapod) was the commonest type reported (42 cases, 35%). Most common fractured process was zygomatic-maxillary buttress (ZM) in 90 cases (75%). Mandibular fracture (15%) was the most common associated facial fractures. Most common accessed approach was the upper buccal in 80 cases (66.6%). Access through a preexisting wound was encountered in 10 cases (8.3%). Four-point fixation (40%) was the commonest point fixation for these fractures. Infra orbital paresthesia (42 cases) was the most common complications encountered. Conclusion: Zygomatic fractures have high morbidity and cost of life. Use of protective devices, strict laws and severe punishments must be implemented to reduce its frequency
Karthik Ragupathy and Sanjay Pasupathy: An epidemiological study of zygomatic complex and zygomatic arch fractures in a tertiary hospital: A retrospective study. Journal of Oral Medicine, Oral Surgery, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, 3 (1): 1-4, 2017. 2- Chattopadhyay P.K. and Chander M.: Management of Zygomatic Complex Fracture in Armed Forces. Med. J. Armed Forces India, 65 (2): 128-30, 2009. 3- Ungari C., Filiaci F., Riccardi E., Rinna C. and Iannetti G.: Etiology and incidence of zygomatic fracture: A retrospective study related to a series of 642 patients. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci., 16 (11): 1559-62, 2012. 4- Obuekwe O., Owotade F. and Osaiyuwu O.: Etiology and pattern of zygomatic complex fractures: A retrospective study. J. Natl. Med. Assoc., 97 (7): 992-6, 2005. 5- Yamamoto K., Matsusue Y., Horita S., Murakami K., Sugiura T. and Kirita T.: Clinical analysis of midfacial fractures. Mater Sociomed., 26 (1): 21-5, 2014. 6- Calderoni D.R., Guidi Mde C., Kharmandayan P. and Nunes P.H.: Seven-year institutional experience in the Egypt, J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., October 2020 533 surgical treatment of orbito-zygomatic fractures. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg., 39 (8): 593-9, 2011. 7- Zingg M., Laedrach K., Chen J., Chowdhury K., Vuillemin T., Sutter F. and Raveh J.: Classification and treatment of zygomatic fractures: A review of 1,025 cases. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 50 (8): 778-90, 1992. 8- Zaleckas L., Pec˘iuliene. V., Gendviliene. I., Pu-riene. A. and Rimkuviene. J.: Prevalence and etiology of midfacial fractures: A study of 799 cases. Medicina (Kaunas), 51 (4): 222-7, 2015. 9. Tripathi G.M., Sharma D., Gaharwar A.P.S., Gupta R., Shukla D. and Shukla V.: Analysis of Prevalence and Pattern of Zygomatic Complex Fractures in North-Eastern Part of Madhya Pradesh, India. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research., 3 (7): 1878-81, 2016. 10. Punjabi S.K., Habib-ur-Rehman, Ali Z. and Ahmed S.: Causes and management of zygomatic bone fractures at Abbasi Shaheed Hospital Karachi (analysis of 82 patients). J. Pak. Med. Assoc., 61 (1): 36-9, 2011. 11- Mijiti A., Ling W., Tuerdi M., Maimaiti A., Tuerxun J., Tao Y.Z., Saimaiti A. and Moming A.: Epidemiological analysis of maxillofacial fractures treated at a university hospital, Xinjiang, China: A 5-year retrospective study. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg., 42 (3): 227-33, 2014. 12- Gaddipati R., Ramisetti S., Vura N., Reddy K.R. and Nalamolu B.: Analysis of 1,545 Fractures of Facial Region- A Retrospective Study. Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr., 8 (4): 307-14, 2015. 13- Bas¸aran K., Saydam F.A., Pilancı Ö., Sag˘ır M. and Güven E.: Optimal treatment of zygomatic fractures: A singlecenter study result. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis, 26 (1): 42- 50, 2016. 14- Naveen Shankar A., Naveen Shankar V., Hegde N. and Prasad R.: The pattern of the maxillofacial fracture sea multi-center retrospective study. J. Craniomaxillofacial Surg., 40: 675-79, 2012. 15- Nordin R., Rahman N.A., Rashdi M.F., et al.: Oral and maxillofacial trauma caused by road traffic accident in two university hospitals in Malaysia: A cross-sectional study. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Med. Pathol., 27: 166- 171, 2015. 16- Trivellato P.F., Arnez M.F., Sverzut C.E. and Trivellato A.E.: A retrospective study of zygomatico-orbital complex and/or zygomatic arch fractures over a 71-month period. Dent Traumatol., 27 (2): 135-42, 2011. 17- Lee K.H., Snape L., Steenberg L.J. and Worthington J.: Comparison between interpersonal violence and motor vehicle accidents in the etiology of maxillofacial fractures. ANZ J. Surg., 77 (8): 695-8, 2007. 18- Adam A.A., Zhi L., Bing L.Z. and Zhong Xing W.U.: Evaluation of treatment of zygomatic bone and zygomatic arch fractures: A retrospective study of 10 years. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg., 11 (2): 171-6, 2012. 19- van Hout W.M., Van Cann E.M., Koole R. and Rosenberg A.J.: Surgical treatment of unilateral zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: A 7-year observational study assessing treatment outcome in 153 cases. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg., 44 (11): 1859-1865, 2016. 20- Gadre P.K., Bhola N., Borle R. and Gadre K.S.: Isolated bilateral zygoma fracture: A rare entity. J. Craniofac. Surg., 24 (4): 1498-500, 2013. 21- Ramanathan M. and Cherian M.P.: Isolated bilateral zygomatic complex and arch fracture: A rare case report. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr., 3 (4): 185-8, 2010. 22- Forouzanfar T., Salentijn E., Peng G. and van den Bergh B.: A 10-year analysis of the "Amsterdam" protocol in the treatment of zygomatic complex fractures. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg., 41 (7): 616-22, 2013. 23- Rana M., Warraich R., Tahir S., Iqbal A., von See C., Eckardt A.M. and Gellrich N.C.: Surgical treatment of zygomatic bone fracture using two-points fixation versus three-points fixation: A Randomised Prospective Clinical Trial. Trials., 12: 13-36, 2012. 24- Parasher A., Sharma R.K. and Makkar S.: Rigid internal fixation of zygomatic fractures: A comparison of 2-point and 3-point fixation. Indian J. Plast. Surg., 40 (01): 18- 24, 2007. 25- Prachur Kumar, Godhi S., Lall A.B. and Ram C.S.: Evaluation of Neurosensory Changes in the Infraorbital Nerve following Zygomatic Fractures. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg., 11 (4): 394-9, 2012. 26- Folkestad L. and Granström G.: A prospective study of orbital fracture sequelae after change of surgical routines. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 61 (9): 1038-44, 2003. 27- Benoliel R., Birenboim R., Regev E. and Eliav E.: Neurosensory changes in the infraorbital nerve following zygomatic fractures. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod., 99 (6): 657-65, 2005. 28- Khreisat M.: Diplopia in zygomatic-complex fracture. Pak Oral Dental J., 31: 27-32, 2011. 29- Manson P. and Iliff N.: Orbital fractures. Facial Plast Surg., 5: 243-259, 1988. 30. Wray R.C., Holtmann B., Ribaudo J.M., et al.: A comparison of conjunctival and subciliary incisions for orbital fractures. Br. J. Plast. Surg., 30: 142-145, 1977. 31- Lacy M.F. and Pospisil O.A.: Lower blepharoplasty postorbicularis approach to the orbit: A prospective study. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 25: 398-40, 1987. 32- Hurrell M.J., Borgna S.C., David M.C. and Batstone M.D.: A multi-outcome analysis of the effects of treatment timing in the management of zygomatic fractures. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 45 (1): 51-6, 2016. 33- Rahman R.A., Ghazali N.M., Rahman N.A., Pohchi A. and Razak N.H.A.: Outcome of Different Treatment Modalities of Fracture Zygoma. J. Craniofac. Surg., 31 (4): 1056-1062, 2020.
View on SCiNiTO
Top